Teams

Team 6 RC United

2022 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-04-24vs Team 2 Big ShotsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesStephen Dugre / Matthew Schenk vs Kyle Gustafson / Haider Abbud2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSteve Ziff / Joel Velasquez vs Carlos Miletti / VI Huynh1-6, 6-0, 1-0
2022-04-22vs Team 5 Wise Ace GOATsLost 01
L#1 SinglesMatthew Schenk vs Lutz Braum1-6, 2-6
2022-04-14Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJoel Velasquez vs Don Spies2-6, 5-4
2022-04-04vs Team 11 VN RacqueteersLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoel Velasquez / Gregg Wollard vs Charles Phan / Dung Bui1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMatthew Schenk vs Babak Rassuli2-6, 2-6
2022-04-02Lost 01
L#1 DoublesStephen Dugre / Matthew Schenk vs David Ashman / Kevin Dalzell1-6, 6-7
2022-03-25vs Team 13 Fever Tree AcademyLost 02
L#1 DoublesStephen Dugre / Joel Velasquez vs Ralph Nappi / Paul Benninghoff6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChristopher Beausoleil / Sean Klinge vs Mark Massey / Taylor McGowan6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2022-03-17vs Team 7 King of the courtSplit 11
L#1 SinglesJoel Velasquez vs Jin Hong3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesChristopher Beausoleil / Matthew Schenk vs Krishna Polisetty / Premkumar Chindepalli6-3, 6-2
2022-03-10vs Team 8Won 20
W#1 DoublesGregg Wollard / Lonn Larson vs Chip Hathaway / Nathan Miller6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristopher Beausoleil / Sean Klinge vs Dayve Forman / Paul Lluy6-1, 6-4
2022-03-05vs Team 9 SweatersSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTodd Gordon / Matthew Schenk vs Manish Desai / Mohit Sehgal6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Flam / Joel Velasquez vs Rajakumar Chithambaram / Sriram Gopalakrishnan4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Matthew Schenk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.75
Todd Gordon
published
3.59
Lonn Larson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Joel Velasquez
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.32
Sean Klinge
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
David Flam
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Matthew Schenk
63W–46L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Christopher Beausoleil
1W–0L career · type M · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Todd Gordon
9W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Lonn Larson
21W–32L career · 1 line in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Joel Velasquez
68W–69L career · 6 lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Sean Klinge
79W–75L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
David Flam
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
46%54%<1%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.