Teams

LCLO-LONG/Peninsula 55s

2023 Lake Combo Doubles 55 & Over · Women 6.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-09-28vs LJAM-Ames/Westport 55s 6.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesMelinda Little / Maureen Leach vs Beth McClay / Zahra Simonetti6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGayle Larson / Sherry Hunstad vs Joanne Empey Rodriguez / Barbara Minor6-1, 6-1
2023-09-10vs LHNY-Nyquist/Jetton 6.5 ComboLost 02
L#2 DoublesMindy Francis / Melinda Little vs Heidi Nyquist / Natalie Reid3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Johnson / Sherry Hunstad vs Norma Zitnik / Sheila Hebert5-7, 4-6
2023-08-31vs LWGO-Goodwin/NMP 6.5 Thurs 55+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMaureen Leach / Melinda Little vs Tammy Fisher / Sandra Dickinson6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2023-08-24vs LRDA-Davis6.5/RRCCWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan King / Suzun McCrary vs Brenda Forouzad / Lisa Squatriglia6-1, 4-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Gayle Larson
published 3.5
3.12
Tracy Podesta
published
3.11
Suzun McCrary
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Mindy Francis
published
2.76
Joy Evans
published
2.73
Melinda Little
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.72
Maureen Swink
published
2.69
Patty Howe
published
2.60
Valerie Smithers
published
2.59
Michele Phelan
published
2.51
Sherry Hunstad
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Maureen Leach
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherry Hunstad + Melinda Little314 matchesnot enough data
Patty Howe + Sherry Hunstad123 matchesnot enough data
Michele Phelan + Melinda Little213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Gayle Larson
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.38
Tracy Podesta
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Suzun McCrary
83W–87L career · 1 line in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.11
Mindy Francis
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.08
Joy Evans
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
2.76
3
Melinda Little
42W–48L career · 3 lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Maureen Swink
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.72
Patty Howe
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
2.69
Valerie Smithers
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
Michele Phelan
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
2.59
3
Sherry Hunstad
28W–54L career · 2 lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
2.51
Maureen Leach
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.