Teams

Lady Love

2026 18&Over Women · 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-07-16vs Green and MeanSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCriselda Farrell / Ashley Chew vs Karina Sanzari / Andrea Mayendia6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDiane Vero / Roselia Mouridy vs Martha Duque / Elizabeth Simeone6-7, 1-6
2026-07-09vs Sweeter ShotsWon 10
W#3 DoublesAshley Chew / Roselia Mouridy vs Gina Harnett / Inna Rozenberg6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-02vs Eastern/Huh-Yoo/18&Over3.0WLost 14
W#1 DoublesCriselda Farrell / Natasha Aronberg vs MAIKO AMANO / Jing Li7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSuzy Arku-Nyadia vs Lulu Cheng3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesShannon Gabriel / Lisa Sommer-Balog vs Sayaka Sung / Chikayo Poston4-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAshley Chew vs Karen Jang3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRoselia Mouridy / Muse Ozalp vs Tara Gebbia / Jina Huh-Yoo0-6, 3-6
2026-06-25vs Green and MeanLost 02
L#1 DoublesRoselia Mouridy / Debbie Miceli vs Karina Sanzari / Andrea Mayendia1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesCriselda Farrell vs Diana Arce5-7, 0-6
2026-06-18vs Sweeter ShotsLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Spangenthal / Debbie Miceli vs Silvana Penava / Marisa Carr1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRoselia Mouridy / Criselda Farrell vs Laura Prah / Inna Rozenberg3-6, 6-6
2026-06-16vs Eastern/Huh-Yoo/18&Over3.0WLost 23
W#1 DoublesMuse Ozalp / Ashley Chew vs Makiko Ishida / Sayaka Sung7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSuzy Arku-Nyadia vs Lulu Cheng6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDeborah Felsenheld / Diane Vero vs Chikayo Poston / Ayumi Lai1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesTaylor Marson vs Mary Anne Carrillo5-7, 5-4
L#3 DoublesNatasha Aronberg / Audrey Gabel vs Jina Huh-Yoo / MAIKO AMANO5-7, 2-6
2026-06-11vs Eastern/Huh-Yoo/18&Over3.0WLost 05
L#1 DoublesDeborah Felsenheld / Diane Vero vs MAIKO AMANO / Jenna Hammond0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSuzy Arku-Nyadia vs Lulu Cheng6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesQi Lin / Muse Ozalp vs Sharon Jacobson / Jing Li0-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesTaylor Marson vs Karen Jang6-4, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAudrey Gabel / Shannon Gabriel vs Christine Young / Jina Huh-Yoo4-6, 5-7
2026-06-04vs Green and MeanLost 01
L#3 DoublesRoselia Mouridy / Debbie Miceli vs Judy Mac / Samantha Koth2-6, 0-6
2026-05-28vs Sweeter ShotsLost 01
L#2 DoublesAudrey Gabel / Criselda Farrell vs Hyunsook Kim / Silvana Penava2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Suzy Arku-Nyadia
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.86
Criselda Farrell
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Ashley Chew
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Deborah Felsenheld
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Diane Vero
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.69
Audrey Gabel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Muse Ozalp
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.60
Lisa Sommer-Balog
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.39
Debbie Miceli
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.35
Roselia Mouridy
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Jennifer Sepulveda
published
Natasha Aronberg
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Qi Lin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Shannon Gabriel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Taylor Marson
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deborah Felsenheld + Diane Vero3443% games−10.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suzy Arku-Nyadia
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Criselda Farrell
7W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Ashley Chew
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Deborah Felsenheld
20W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Diane Vero
21W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Audrey Gabel
5W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Muse Ozalp
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Lisa Sommer-Balog
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.60
3
Debbie Miceli
9W–13L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
79%21%<1%
2.39
Roselia Mouridy
11W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.35
Jennifer Sepulveda
19W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Jennifer Spangenthal
12W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Natasha Aronberg
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Qi Lin
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Shannon Gabriel
2W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Taylor Marson
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.