Teams

LA - Slice N Spice

2025 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 4.5

15 players · average NTRP 4.06 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-01vs LA - Kiss My Ace 4.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJana Conley / Emily Werman vs Clare Burks / Vilayvanh Shah1-6, 3-6
2025-10-23vs LA - Kiss My Ace 4.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesJana Conley / Debie Marsden vs Isis Anderson / Sona Arutyunyan0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCelia Dominguez / Linda Govel vs Vilayvanh Shah / Kimberly Strickland0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJana Conley / Emily Werman vs Kristina Chen / Christine Chen2-6, 1-6
2025-09-14vs LA - HitWomenLost 03
L#1 DoublesCelia Dominguez / Sherryl Chaffin vs Maria de Carvalho / Tara Shultz2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJana Conley / Ayanna Maharry vs Mimi Kahn / Marion Galliford2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Indeglia / Aubrey Karr vs AB Young / Joanna Morley1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCelia Dominguez / Emily Werman vs Kristina Chen / Christine Chen2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.08
Karen Beard
published
4.04
Alison Harma
published 4.5
4.00
Jennifer Lawler
published
3.96
Trish Halamandaris
published
3.75
Debie Marsden
published 4
Amy Karr
published 4
Celia Dominguez
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Eve Coquillard
published 4
3.74
Linda Govel
published
3.73
Karen Indeglia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.69
Susan Raifman
published
3.69
Aubrey Karr
published 4
3.66
Kari Simmons
published
3.59
Jana Conley
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Sherryl Chaffin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jana Conley + Karen Indeglia2734% gamesnot enough data
Trish Halamandaris + Jennifer Lawler044 matchesnot enough data
Karen Indeglia + Linda Govel213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Beard
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.08
4.5
Alison Harma
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
4.04
Jennifer Lawler
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
4.00
Trish Halamandaris
1W–9L career · no lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
3.96
4
Debie Marsden
17W–10L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.75
4
Amy Karr
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Celia Dominguez
58W–99L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Eve Coquillard
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Linda Govel
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%2%
3.74
4
Karen Indeglia
50W–51L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
Susan Raifman
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Aubrey Karr
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.69
Kari Simmons
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Jana Conley
40W–84L career · 4 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.59
Sherryl Chaffin
2W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.