Teams

Riverchase - Steed

2022 B'ham Combo - Adult 40 & Over Women Weekday · 8.5 Thursday

12 players · average NTRP 4.25 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 8.5 Thursday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Tami Hansen
published
3.98
Holly Sherrer
published 4
3.95
Lynne Mohlenbrok
published
3.95
Beth English
published 4.5
3.85
Kim Nolen
published
3.85
Janet Wang
published
3.83
Juanita Taylor
published
3.82
Karen Keene
published
3.82
Tracy Strickland
published
3.75
Linda Sink
published
3.69
Ramona Cunningham
published
Laurie Rigsby
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ramona Cunningham + Linda Sink8651% games−3.5% vs expected
Tami Hansen + Juanita Taylor314 matchesnot enough data
Karen Keene + Holly Sherrer404 matchesnot enough data
Karen Keene + Laurie Rigsby134 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Strickland + Holly Sherrer044 matchesnot enough data
Tami Hansen + Lynne Mohlenbrok213 matchesnot enough data
Tami Hansen + Kim Nolen303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tami Hansen
34W–13L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4
Holly Sherrer
114W–51L career · no lines in 2022
<1%55%45%
3.98
Lynne Mohlenbrok
21W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%<1%>99%
3.95
4.5
Beth English
13W–6L career · no lines in 2022
65%35%<1%
3.95
Kim Nolen
14W–20L career · no lines in 2022
87%13%<1%
3.85
Janet Wang
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.85
Juanita Taylor
14W–25L career · no lines in 2022
90%10%<1%
3.83
Karen Keene
52W–14L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Tracy Strickland
29W–16L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Linda Sink
19W–12L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Ramona Cunningham
15W–11L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Laurie Rigsby
9W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.