Teams

PRC:Mixed Up Nuts:Mauro/

2024 NCT Mixed 40 & Over · 6.0 40 & Over Mixed 1

10 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-05-19vs BTC:Bloomfield Bobcats:Grubin/Won 20
W#1 DoublesMarc LaPierre / ALYCE STILES vs Sandrine Sebag / Mark Grubin7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Scarfo / Jill Scarfo vs Sophia Walters / Marvyn Walters6-1, 6-4
2024-05-10vs FV:Dare Doubles:Testerman/RubinoWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarc LaPierre / ALYCE STILES vs XIA TANG / Michael LaTour6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDieter Fehlinger / Sandra Mauro vs Carlos Boltes-Palma / Feray Tezcan6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-04-14vs FV:Dare Doubles:Testerman/RubinoLost 03
L#1 DoublesALYCE STILES / Marc LaPierre vs Paola Rubino / Brendan Moynihan0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJill Scarfo / John Scarfo vs Michael LaTour / XIA TANG3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSandra Mauro / Dieter Fehlinger vs Janice Testerman / Jie Huang4-6, 3-6
2024-04-07vs GTC:Causing a Racquet:Mabe/SmithWon 21
W#1 DoublesALYCE STILES / Marc LaPierre vs JoAnne Ramm / Jim Keith1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJill Scarfo / John Scarfo vs Melissa Mabe / Howard Weissberg0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSandra Mauro / Dieter Fehlinger vs Marisol Ostrov / Antonio Eason6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-03-24vs RFL:The Swingers:Braun/Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJill Scarfo / John Scarfo vs Danielle Braun / Jayme Varao5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDieter Fehlinger / Sandra Mauro vs Lisa Levine / John Danielsen6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMarie Malloy / David Pickett vs Rob Schumann / Kaitlin Halloran0-6, 2-6
2024-03-03vs RFL:The Swingers:Braun/Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJill Scarfo / John Scarfo vs Danielle Braun / Jayme Varao0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMarie Malloy / Cecil Ugarte vs Tim Davignon / Tanya Davignon7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesALYCE STILES / Dieter Fehlinger vs Paul Braun / Nan Flanagan2-6, 4-6
2024-02-18vs BTC:Bloomfield Bobcats:Grubin/Won 21
L#1 DoublesJill Scarfo / John Scarfo vs Veronica Grubin / Mark Grubin2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSandra Mauro / Dieter Fehlinger vs Sten Caspersson / Joni Harris6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEileen Gargan / Cecil Ugarte vs Anne Pidano / Mark Zweifler6-1, 6-0
2024-02-04vs GTC:Causing a Racquet:Mabe/SmithLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarc LaPierre / ALYCE STILES vs Kim Consoli / James Stapleton6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesSandra Mauro / Dieter Fehlinger vs Melissa Mabe / Howard Weissberg1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMarie Malloy / Cecil Ugarte vs Jill Kehl / Antonio Eason7-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 6.0 40 & Over Mixed 1
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PRC:Mixed Up Nuts:Mauro/08101332238
2MLM:Mixed Magic:Lincer/0832143269
3GTC:Causing a Racquet:Mabe/Smith01019922220
4FV:Dare Doubles:Testerman/Rubino010201025189
5RFL:The Swingers:Braun/010191128263
6BTC:Bloomfield Bobcats:Grubin/010111840302

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Sandra Mauro
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.94
Marc LaPierre
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Cecil Ugarte
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
ALYCE STILES
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.83
John Scarfo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
David Pickett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Marie Malloy
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.59
Jill Scarfo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.22
Dieter Fehlinger
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 2.5
Eileen Gargan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

ALYCE STILES + Marc LaPierre22955% games+9.8% vs expected
Sandra Mauro + Dieter Fehlinger92438% games+0.4% vs expected
Jill Scarfo + John Scarfo81742% games−5.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sandra Mauro
111W–148L career · 6 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Marc LaPierre
85W–59L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%65%34%
2.94
3
Cecil Ugarte
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
ALYCE STILES
89W–64L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%83%17%
2.87
John Scarfo
26W–39L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
David Pickett
22W–60L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Marie Malloy
19W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%88%1%
2.67
Jill Scarfo
24W–45L career · 6 lines in 2024
26%73%<1%
2.59
2.5
Dieter Fehlinger
12W–39L career · type M · 7 lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.22
Eileen Gargan
7W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.