Teams

OC LLW LNRC - Jennifer - Sat1030

2023 SCTA Doubles 18 & Over - OC · OC Women WE - 5.0+

15 players · average NTRP 5.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-12-09vs OC Los Cab - TracyLost 01
L#1 DoublesCaitlin Bernard / Danielle Caro vs Kathy Archibald / Debbie Spence-Nasim3-6, 2-6
2023-11-22vs OC LPC - EmilyWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Dubow / Caitlin Bernard vs Emily Wu / Connie Espina6-3, 6-1
2023-10-28vs OC LPC - MouttapaLost 01
L#1 DoublesLauren Spencer / Caitlin Bernard vs Trina Eggers / Jennifer Beindorf2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2023-10-08vs OC LPC - MouttapaWon 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Dubow / Kristine Kouyoumjian vs Michele Mouttapa / Krystal Meier6-3, 6-0
2023-10-07Won 10
W#1 DoublesLauren Spencer / Kristine Kouyoumjian vs Janine Kremling / Emily Sophie Thieme6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women WE - 5.0+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.60 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.97
Erynne Mercado
published 5
4.97
Caitlin Bernard
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5.5
4.79
Kristine Kouyoumjian
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
Cassie Bergeson
published 5
Dunya Ahrns
published 5
4.74
Roxanne Ellison
published
4.71
Claire Handa
published 5
4.56
Danielle Caro
published 5
4.51
Jennifer Dubow
published
4.46
Amanda Varela
published 5
4.36
Margaux Kugelman
published
4.36
Alissa Ahlman
published 4.5
4.18
Nikki Fermin
published
Lauren Spencer
published
Mayci Neeley
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Erynne Mercado
11W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
4.97
5.5
Caitlin Bernard
3W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
4.97
5
Kristine Kouyoumjian
161W–70L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
4.79
5
Cassie Bergeson
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
5
Dunya Ahrns
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Roxanne Ellison
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
4.74
5
Claire Handa
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
4.71
5
Danielle Caro
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
4.56
Jennifer Dubow
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
4.51
5
Amanda Varela
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
4.46
Margaux Kugelman
7W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%14%
4.36
4.5
Alissa Ahlman
28W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%14%
4.36
Nikki Fermin
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
9%91%1%
4.18
Lauren Spencer
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mayci Neeley
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.