Teams

MCTA55/Martin/RHTC

Adult 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult Women - 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.42 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-11vs MCTA55/Han/RHTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTisa Mullis / Nicole Morgan vs Joy Landesman / Sandra Stowe1-2
W#2 DoublesLizette Conover / Shelly Steffey vs Alberta McCullough / Christine Schatt6-1, 6-3
2026-03-28vs MCTA 3.5W 55 & Over (Bloomberg)Lost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Benton / Lizette Conover vs Teresa Rhyne / Ellen Archer1-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesShela Villamor / Deborah Lung vs Sara Benedict / Judith Skelton0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTisa Mullis / Janice Daniel vs Lynn Selland / Joni Smith7-5, 6-3
2026-03-21vs MCTA (W) 3.5W 55 & Over (PopeLost 03
L#1 DoublesTisa Mullis / Nicole Morgan vs Kelley Morabito / Barbara Rawdon1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJanice Daniel / Pauline Styers vs Bonnie Champion / Jill Carnahan1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Lung / Shela Villamor vs Pamela Faile / Shawne Batterbee6-7, 6-7
2026-03-14vs MCTA55/Han/RHTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPauline Styers / Sherry Teat vs Sandra Stowe / Joy Landesman1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJulie Benton / Nicole Morgan vs Alberta McCullough / Mildred Deely6-2, 6-2
2026-03-07vs MCTA 3.5W 55 & Over (Bloomberg)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDeborah Lung / Tisa Mullis vs Patty Mullins / Erin Bloomberg7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJanice Daniel / Nicole Morgan vs Carol Prince / Sara Benedict4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLizette Conover / Kelley Conrad vs Sarah Asby / Joni Smith4-6, 2-6
2026-02-21vs MCTA (W) 3.5W 55 & Over (PopeLost 03
L#1 DoublesKelley Conrad / Nicole Morgan vs Donna Musante / Rae Lynn Pope2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJulie Benton / Sherry Teat vs Kristen Unterberg / Laura Cass3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTisa Mullis / Janice Daniel vs Pamela Faile / Shawne Batterbee4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Janice Daniel
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.28
Tisa Mullis
usually #3 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.24
Julie Benton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.23
Shelly Steffey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Deborah Lung
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Sherry Teat
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Lizette Conover
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.97
Nicole Morgan
usually #1 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
2.94
Shela Villamor
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.93
Pauline Styers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Kelley Conrad
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tisa Mullis + Pauline Styers7158% gamesnot enough data
Shelly Steffey + Pauline Styers1532% gamesnot enough data
Janice Daniel + Pauline Styers123 matchesnot enough data
Tisa Mullis + Kelley Conrad123 matchesnot enough data
Tisa Mullis + Shela Villamor123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janice Daniel
17W–23L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
Tisa Mullis
139W–140L career · 9 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Julie Benton
35W–31L career · 6 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
Shelly Steffey
44W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Deborah Lung
44W–58L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Sherry Teat
115W–50L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
3
Lizette Conover
53W–34L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.09
Nicole Morgan
15W–39L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3.5
Shela Villamor
56W–93L career · 2 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.94
3.5
Pauline Styers
67W–88L career · 2 lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
2.93
Kelley Conrad
24W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.