Teams

MARIN TC 18AM3.5A

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 3.5

22 players · average NTRP 3.56 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-06-16Won 10
W#3 DoublesDerek Boorse / Mark Clem vs Hugh Barron / Scott Green6-2, 6-0
2024-06-13Won 10
W#2 DoublesDerek Boorse / Elliott Magnuson vs Greg Hermanski / Mathew Lori6-1, 6-2
2024-06-11vs MT TAM RC 18AM3.5AWon 10
W#1 SinglesMatthew Core vs Kevin Cohou6-2, 6-2
2024-06-08vs ROLLING HILLS 18AM3.5AWon 10
W#1 SinglesMatthew Core vs Patrick Rimbaud6-2, 6-1
2024-06-01vs MT TAM RC 18AM3.5AWon 20
W#1 DoublesMatthew Core / Michael Graziano vs David Grayson / Stephen Crump6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDerek Boorse / Elliott Magnuson vs William Forbes / David Stolberg6-2, 6-0
2024-05-22vs MILL VALLEY 18AM3.5AWon 20
W#2 DoublesMichael Graziano / Derek Boorse vs Jerry Labay / Jonathan Weis6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMatthew Core / Jody Osterweil vs Robert Swenson / Patrick Yaeger6-0, 6-1
2024-05-19vs LAGUNITAS CC 18AM3.5AWon 20
W#1 DoublesDerek Boorse / Michael Graziano vs Courtney OConnell / Richard Roberts6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMatthew Core vs Johnny Boynton6-1, 6-1
2024-05-12vs BAY CLUB ROSS VALLEY 18AM3.5AWon 20
W#1 DoublesMatthew Core / Ryan Brown vs Kevin Taylor / Jonathan Hwa6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDerek Boorse / Jody Osterweil vs Greg Sieck / Anton Muzik6-2, 6-2
2024-04-28vs TIBURON PEN C 18AM3.5AWon 20
W#1 DoublesMatthew Core / Michael Graziano vs Joshua Endler / Charles Muller4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDerek Boorse / Jody Osterweil vs Hector Gutierrez / Cliff Plumer7-5, 6-1
2024-04-14vs ROLLING HILLS 18AM3.5AWon 10
W#1 DoublesChris Cooper / Matthew Core vs Steven Lund / Ian Scott6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.68
Michael Graziano
published
3.62
Tassos Papadimos
published
3.53
Matthew Core
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #1 Singles 27% · published 3.5
3.53
Chris Cooper
published 3.5
3.50
Elliott Magnuson
published
3.50
Ara Hamamjian
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.48
Vladimir Matyurin
published
3.47
Doke Kim
published
3.39
Greg Friedman
published
3.39
Jeff Loebbaka
published
3.37
Joseph Gil
published
3.35
Jody Osterweil
published
3.34
Derek Boorse
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.31
David Shepard
published 3.5
3.28
Monte Zweben
published
3.25
Mark Clem
published
3.19
Babak Jamasbi
published 3.5
3.18
Stacy Nimmo
published
3.15
Gervais Tompkin
published
3.10
Andrew Fremier
published 3.5
Adam Fliss
published 3
Edward Berg
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Derek Boorse + Ara Hamamjian5456% gamesnot enough data
Elliott Magnuson + Jeff Loebbaka3356% gamesnot enough data
Elliott Magnuson + Mark Clem213 matchesnot enough data
Derek Boorse + Michael Graziano033 matchesnot enough data
Chris Cooper + Matthew Core213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Graziano
21W–8L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Tassos Papadimos
12W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%19%81%
3.62
3.5
Matthew Core
122W–79L career · 11 lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Chris Cooper
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.53
Elliott Magnuson
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.50
4
Ara Hamamjian
57W–80L career · 5 lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
Vladimir Matyurin
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%55%45%
3.48
Doke Kim
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.47
Greg Friedman
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
Jeff Loebbaka
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
Joseph Gil
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.37
Jody Osterweil
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%84%15%
3.35
4
Derek Boorse
137W–176L career · 10 lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
3.34
3.5
David Shepard
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Monte Zweben
0W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
3.28
Mark Clem
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Babak Jamasbi
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Stacy Nimmo
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Gervais Tompkin
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Andrew Fremier
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
3
Adam Fliss
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Edward Berg
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.