← Teams

MAC-Cooney

2021 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.35 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Kristen LaBarca
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
—
Brooke Daniel
usually #1 Doubles 45%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published 3.5
—
Melissa Gibson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Amy Cooney
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
America Hopson
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Sarah Robertson
usually #3 Doubles 31%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.07
Christian Buchholz
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
2.96
Jacquelyn Miller
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.83
Barbra Jorgensen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
—
Patries Ferguson
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results6 ties
2021-05-14Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesBarbra Jorgensen / Sarah Robertson vs Shannon Roarke / Kayleen Mendenhall6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAmerica Hopson / Brooke Daniel vs Hong Huynh / Laurence Dupray6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesAmy Cooney / Kristen LaBarca vs Tina Prassas / Marilyn Sims6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-07Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesAmy Cooney / Sara Stewart vs Kathryn Eddy / Megan Daniels4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSarah Robertson / Christian Buchholz vs Michelle Beilstein / Brooke Daugherty6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesAmerica Hopson vs Patricia Board4-6, 3-0
L#3 DoublesShelly Bigley / Patries Ferguson vs Casey Cobb / Amy Bucher6-0, 6-0
2021-04-30Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesBrooke Daniel / Elizabeth Burns vs Jeri Finn / Yoko Moore6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChristian Buchholz / Barbra Jorgensen vs Becky Holzman / Julie Kim7-6, 4-1
W#2 SinglesKristen LaBarca vs Tammy Cofield6-4, 4-2
L#3 DoublesSarah Robertson / Shelly Bigley vs Kayla Casebeer / Tove Maloco5-7, 5-3, 1-0
2021-04-17Lost 0–4
L#1 DoublesBrooke Daniel / Amy Cooney vs Lynne Nieda / Kyra John6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesChristian Buchholz vs Katrina Phillips6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesShelly Bigley / Kristen LaBarca vs Danielle Barrett / Karen Pickering6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPatries Ferguson / Jacquelyn Miller vs Natalya Ramras / Dayna Porter6-1, 6-2
2021-04-10Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesAmy Cooney / Brooke Daniel vs Kyra John / Lynne Nieda6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesAmerica Hopson vs Carrie Willis4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBarbra Jorgensen / Kristen LaBarca vs Molly Wilson / Rachel Olsen6-4, 6-1
2021-04-02Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Burns / Sarah Robertson vs Lana Lane / Suzie Glenn6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesChristian Buchholz / Barbra Jorgensen vs Kathleen Sullivan / Gretchen Newcomb7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJacquelyn Miller / Patries Ferguson vs Chikako Hokanson / Paula Conway6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Kristen LaBarca
65W–38L career
0%90%10%
3.44
3.5
Brooke Daniel
66W–48L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Melissa Gibson
31W–30L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Amy Cooney
43W–50L career
4%96%1%
3.23
3.5
America Hopson
22W–43L career
7%93%0%
3.18
3.5
Sarah Robertson
72W–98L career
9%91%0%
3.13
3.5
Christian Buchholz
68W–109L career
16%84%0%
3.07
3
Jacquelyn Miller
29W–28L career
0%77%22%
2.96
3
Barbra Jorgensen
20W–30L career
2%92%7%
2.83
3
Patries Ferguson
29W–31L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.