Teams

Supreme Court

2021 NOVA Adult 18 & Over · NOVA Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-06-18vs A Little Slice of LoveLost 02
L#1 DoublesJanice Zima / Kathy Potter vs Eleanor McManus / Jennifer Malloy0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDonna Biderman / Laura Riesenberg vs Jennifer Graham / Tram Nguyen4-6, 3-6
2021-06-15vs Spin DoctorsLost 01
L#1 SinglesArchella Dorsey vs Cynthia Pearson5-7, 1-2
2021-06-12vs Team RJT W3.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesJanice Zima / Patricia Morris vs Carrie Fleming / Amy Heuer6-2, 6-1
2021-06-09vs RJ Hot SeatsLost 01
L#2 DoublesSara Franklin / Laura Riesenberg vs Patricia Trapanese / Stephanie Peebles3-6, 1-6
2021-06-07vs RJ Hot SeatsLost 02
L#1 SinglesArchella Dorsey vs Maria Costea3-6, 2-3
L#3 DoublesDonna Biderman / Laura Riesenberg vs Stephanie Bozarth / Holly Rasmussen5-7, 0-6
2021-06-02vs A Little Slice of LoveLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Riesenberg / Paula Grenier vs Eleanor McManus / Karen Sullivan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-05-21vs Sassy SmashersLost 01
L#2 SinglesArchella Dorsey vs Indre Conners4-6, 1-4
2021-05-18vs Spin DoctorsSplit 11
L#2 SinglesArchella Dorsey vs Heather Williams2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Riesenberg / Kathy Potter vs Paula Murphy / Tiffany Malloy6-3, 6-2
2021-05-15vs Team RJT W3.0Won 10
W#2 DoublesLaura Riesenberg / Patricia Morris vs Theresa Jones / Kathleen Lee6-2, 7-5
2021-05-01vs Slice GirlsWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Riesenberg / Silvia Gulino vs Kristin Kahn / AUGUSTA MOLNAR6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Page Coleman
published
2.94
Sara Franklin
published
2.87
Anna Monaghan
published 3
2.85
Janice Zima
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.82
Archella Dorsey
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.68
Laura Riesenberg
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.53
Kathy Potter
published
Shelly Briscoe
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Page Coleman
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
Sara Franklin
5W–5L career · no lines in 2021
68%32%<1%
2.94
3
Anna Monaghan
4W–1L career · no lines in 2021
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Janice Zima
231W–194L career · 7 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Archella Dorsey
114W–147L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Laura Riesenberg
88W–73L career · 7 lines in 2021
9%91%1%
2.68
Kathy Potter
15W–45L career · no lines in 2021
40%60%<1%
2.53
Shelly Briscoe
6W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.