Teams

Sunset Aces

2024 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.14 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-12-08vs Valle Lindo VolleygirlsWon 10
W#2 DoublesJANE HUANG / Suzanne Hartz vs Anne Renard / Tiffany Israel6-2, 6-2
2024-11-03vs WACtown Girls!Won 10
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Hartz / Jennifer Meckfessel vs Marty Fraser / Robbie Knauer6-0, 6-0
2024-10-06vs V-LLW Loosely Strung-ThompsonLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Khiem / Suzanne Hartz vs Patricia Palafox / Nora Cohen0-6, 4-6
2024-09-29vs Royal GirlfriendsLost 01
L#1 DoublesInna Skripnikova / Suzanne Hartz vs Sandra Jou / Neda Khavari1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Inna Skripnikova
published 3.5
3.34
Patty Starkey
published
3.24
Jennifer Khiem
published
3.23
Jennifer Meckfessel
published
2.99
Callie Paranick
published 3.5
2.90
2.88
Dawn Stutzman
published 3
2.85
Nora Valentino
published
Christina Yumul
published 3
2.74
JANE HUANG
published 3
2.70
Heather Kawai
published 3
2.69
Suzanne Hartz
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.56
Marcela Cepeda
published
2.48
Sophie Clowes
published
2.09
Marianne Acerboni
published
Lydia Davila
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Heather Kawai + Nora Valentino4251% games+7.2% vs expected
Suzanne Hartz + Nora Valentino134 matchesnot enough data
Dawn Stutzman + Callie Paranick224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Inna Skripnikova
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%14%
3.36
Patty Starkey
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
3.34
Jennifer Khiem
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
Jennifer Meckfessel
29W–10L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Callie Paranick
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.99
3
Catherine Loubier
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.90
3
Dawn Stutzman
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
2.88
Nora Valentino
17W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Christina Yumul
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
JANE HUANG
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
3
Heather Kawai
15W–16L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
Suzanne Hartz
55W–81L career · 9 lines in 2024
8%92%1%
2.69
Marcela Cepeda
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.56
Sophie Clowes
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.48
Marianne Acerboni
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
2.09
Lydia Davila
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.