Teams

WC SD 9.0 UCRC/ Wilson

2026 Adult 55 & Over Spring · Summer- SDNC

13 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Summer- SDNC have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.05 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Rainy Miller
published 5
4.21
Fiona Taylor
published
4.17
Masako Wilson
published 4.5
4.14
Leslie Rangel
published 4.5
4.12
Sophia Richardson
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
4.12
Adria Hilsdorf
published 4.5
4.06
Rosalia Acosta
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.01
Miki Shintani
published 4.5
3.97
Neda Mesri
published 4.5
3.96
Claire Douthit
published 4.5
3.95
Anastacia Blazevich
published 4.5
3.86
Linda Park
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Neda Mesri + Fiona Taylor4161% games+8.3% vs expected
Neda Mesri + Adria Hilsdorf12952% games+3.7% vs expected
Masako Wilson + Miki Shintani3548% gamesnot enough data
Sophia Richardson + Fiona Taylor3255% gamesnot enough data
Masako Wilson + Adria Hilsdorf2347% gamesnot enough data
Neda Mesri + Anastacia Blazevich224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Rainy Miller
44W–28L career · type S · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Fiona Taylor
8W–6L career · no lines in 2026
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Masako Wilson
58W–40L career · no lines in 2026
12%88%1%
4.17
4.5
Leslie Rangel
4W–11L career · type S · no lines in 2026
15%84%1%
4.14
Sophia Richardson
27W–31L career · 9 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Adria Hilsdorf
73W–54L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
4.12
Rosalia Acosta
14W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%33%67%
4.06
4.5
Miki Shintani
58W–76L career · no lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
4.01
4.5
Neda Mesri
96W–82L career · no lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
3.97
4.5
Claire Douthit
126W–103L career · no lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
3.96
4.5
Anastacia Blazevich
28W–47L career · no lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
3.95
4
Clare Salcedo-Obert
28W–18L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.86
Linda Park
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.