Teams

Made To Move, Knapp/Kolomick

2025 65&Over Women · 6.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LONG ISLAND REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-08-13vs Carefree, Bracco (D)Split 11
L#1 DoublesMichelle Loretto / Lisa Nathanson vs Linda Bracco / Diane Pellechia6-7, 3-5
W#2 DoublesDeborah Kolomick / Sandra Luethi vs Wendy Heller / Barbara Kearney6-1, 6-4
2025-08-06vs Eastern/Ruppert/65&Over6.0WLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Nathanson / Michelle Loretto vs Mary Alice Ruppert / Diane Allaire4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJoanne Gehrke / Terry Marchese vs Janet Craft / Sharon Cook6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDeborah Chambers / Deborah Kolomick vs Loretta Brennan / Susan Elgart7-5, 6-3
2025-07-30vs Huntington, PeifferWon 21
L#1 DoublesJoanne Gehrke / Grace Iaffaldano vs Evelyn Dauer / Mary Ann McCruden7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDeborah Chambers / Deborah Kolomick vs Sunny Popkin / Susan Blog6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Knapp / Sandra Luethi vs Elyse Feldman / Beth Hacker6-0, 6-4
2025-07-21vs Carefree, Bracco (D)Won 30
W#1 DoublesMichelle Loretto / Lisa Nathanson vs Linda Bracco / Mariann Weiser6-4, 5-5
W#2 DoublesSandra Luethi / Heidi Hamilton vs Barbara Kearney / Wendy Heller3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDeborah Chambers / Joanne Gehrke vs ROSA MONTOYA / Peggy Maslow7-6, 6-2
2025-07-14vs Eastern/Ruppert/65&Over6.0WWon 21
L#1 DoublesHeidi Hamilton / Sandra Luethi vs Annmarie Citarella / Mary Alice Ruppert4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTerry Marchese / Grace Iaffaldano vs Sharon Cook / Susan Elgart6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDeborah Chambers / Deborah Kolomick vs Carol Tricoles / Kathleen Coffey6-0, 6-2
2025-07-08vs Huntington, PeifferWon 30
W#1 DoublesJoanne Gehrke / Terry Marchese vs Evelyn Dauer / Janet Goldstein6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesDeborah Chambers / Grace Iaffaldano vs Mary Ann McCruden / Elyse Feldman6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNancy Knapp / Deborah Kolomick vs Mary O'Grady / Jacqueline Peiffer6-4, 6-2
2025-06-24vs Carefree, Bracco (D)Won 30
W#1 DoublesJoanne Gehrke / Terry Marchese vs Robin Peck / Barbara Mascolo6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichelle Loretto / Lisa Nathanson vs Barbara Kearney / Judy Varriale6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDeborah Kolomick / Deborah Chambers vs Peggy Maslow / ROSA MONTOYA6-0, 7-5
2025-06-17vs Eastern/Ruppert/65&Over6.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesTerry Marchese / Joanne Gehrke vs Diane Allaire / Annmarie Citarella3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDeborah Kolomick / Sandra Luethi vs Karen Abbondondelo / Mary Alice Ruppert3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNancy Knapp / Heidi Hamilton vs Loretta Brennan / Josephine Mascolo4-6, 1-6
2025-06-10vs Huntington, PeifferWon 21
L#1 DoublesJanet Goldstein / Susan Blog vs Heidi Hamilton - * / Sandra Luethi - *2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Knapp / Terry Marchese vs Mary O'Grady / Jacqueline Peiffer6-0, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Loretto / Lisa Nathanson vs Elyse Feldman / Sunny Popkin6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Grace Iaffaldano
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Deborah Chambers
published 3
2.71
Heidi Hamilton
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.64
Deborah Kolomick
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
Joanne Gehrke
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Lisa Nathanson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Michelle Loretto
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Nancy Knapp
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Sandra Luethi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Terry Marchese
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terry Marchese + Joanne Gehrke14757% games+0.1% vs expected
Terry Marchese + Grace Iaffaldano11753% games−1.9% vs expected
Michelle Loretto + Lisa Nathanson71343% games−6.3% vs expected
Joanne Gehrke + Grace Iaffaldano4256% gamesnot enough data
Sandra Luethi + Heidi Hamilton4157% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Kolomick + Sandra Luethi123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Grace Iaffaldano
54W–51L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Deborah Chambers
9W–13L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Heidi Hamilton
5W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Deborah Kolomick
59W–150L career · 7 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
Joanne Gehrke
26W–33L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Nathanson
15W–51L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Loretto
17W–40L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nancy Knapp
14W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sandra Luethi
27W–34L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Terry Marchese
34W–31L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.