Teams

KIG:Kingsbury:Stover/LeWine

2023 EMA Tri Level · 3.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.25 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-12-03vs BBC:Brown Billone:CurranLost 01
L#1 DoublesLauren Frame / Katie WhelPley vs Susan Purdue / Heather Luke3-6, 1-6
2023-12-02vs LAK:Lakeville:KelliherLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Bradley / Lauren Frame vs Zoe Kelliher / Anna Kimball2-6, 5-7
2023-11-19vs BBC:Brown Billone:CurranLost 01
L#1 DoublesFelicia Stover / Melinda Hawkes vs Dawn Curran / Cathy Davis2-6, 2-6
2023-11-12vs SSY:South Shore:BakerLost 01
L#1 DoublesLauren Frame / Melinda Hawkes vs Meaghan Chapman / Lori Norton0-6, 1-6
2023-11-05vs KIG:Kingsbury:MeyerLost 01
L#1 DoublesSusan Evans / Felicia Stover vs Nancy Cloonan / Diana Walsh2-6, 0-6
2023-10-22vs LAK:Lakeville:KelliherLost 01
L#1 DoublesFelicia Stover / Lauren Frame vs Sarah Belmore / Anna Kimball1-6, 1-6
2023-10-08vs SSY:South Shore:BakerLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Bradley / Susan Evans vs Rebecca Baker / Melissa Mcinnis4-6, 2-6
2023-10-01vs KIG:Kingsbury:MeyerLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Bradley / Felicia Stover vs Madeleine Sampson / Kathy Schelleng6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2023-09-24vs ADI:Adirondack:HaaseLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Bradley / Katie WhelPley vs Michele Devens / Carol O'Neill1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WOB:Woburn:Bell9191673
2BBC:Brown Billone:Curran8282670
3PAX;Ms.Hits:Rogers7272664
4WAC:Waltham:Finnie7373778
5SSY:South Shore:Baker7373778
6LFW:Wayland:Williams/Fordiani7373879
7LAK:Lakeville:Kelliher6464883
8KIG:Kingsbury:Meyer55551294
9WAY:Wayside Blue:Burri/Pulnik45451193
10PAX:Short tops:Donahue45451286
11LTC:Lexington TC:Miller/Weidman464614103
12WESB:Slice Girls;Nichols/Sullivan-Kreiss36361287
13ADI:Adirondack:Haase36361392
14WOB:Tri Fun Tennis:Maguire37371598
15KIG:Kingsbury:Stover/LeWine090918108
16LFW:Wayland:Ackerley01001020120

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Elizabeth Bradley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Melinda Hawkes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Felicia Stover
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Katie WhelPley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Frame
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Elizabeth Bradley
37W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%44%56%
3.52
Melinda Hawkes
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
2.94
3
Felicia Stover
2W–10L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Katie WhelPley
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lauren Frame
5W–11L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.