Teams

DO - Perry

2025 Dothan USTA Mixed 18 & Over Summer · 3.5 Mixed

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-21vs WTC - HPerry 18 3.5 Summer MixedWon 20
W#1 DoublesTrent Hopton-Jones / Callie Ventress vs Helen Mendheim / Davis Drake6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCaitlin Perry / James Phillips vs Justin Littles / Angie Mcdaniel6-3
2025-07-20vs WTC - HPerry 18 3.5 Summer MixedWon 20
W#1 DoublesCaitlin Perry / Joseph Cason vs Angie Mcdaniel / Robert Lee7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesVan Hughes / Benjamin Odom vs Justin Littles / Elizabeth Odom6-4, 6-2
2025-07-14vs WTC - HPerry 18 3.5 Summer MixedWon 20
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Odom / Van Hughes vs Elizabeth Odom / Justin Littles6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJessica Givens / Davis Flowers vs Helen Mendheim / Robert Lee6-4, 6-2
2025-06-29vs WTC - HPerry 18 3.5 Summer MixedWon 20
W#1 DoublesVan Hughes / Benjamin Odom vs Helen Mendheim / Davis Drake6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAshley Lee / Joseph Cason vs Robert Lee / Michelle Jones6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Davis Flowers
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.57
Ashley Lee
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Jessica Givens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Trent Hopton-Jones
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Joseph Cason
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Van Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Caitlin Perry
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Benjamin Odom
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.22
Johnny Cook
published
3.18
Callie Ventress
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Benjamin Odom + Van Hughes5069% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Davis Flowers
6W–0L career · type M · 1 line in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
4
Ashley Lee
9W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Jessica Givens
8W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
Trent Hopton-Jones
27W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%34%
3.44
Joseph Cason
14W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Van Hughes
83W–83L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Caitlin Perry
14W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Benjamin Odom
8W–1L career · type T · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.28
Johnny Cook
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Callie Ventress
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.