Teams

*8-DVyas-Eno

2024 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Men Weekend

10 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-08vs *2-KMoyung-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesJosh Jones / Dipen Vyas vs Barry Gooch / Brady Sowers5-7, 2-6
2024-04-28vs *3-RGoff-EnoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDipen Vyas / Siming Mu vs Raymond Xu / Lucas Hubbard2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesTevin Wilson vs Scott Scarneo6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-04-14vs *1-JByrd2-EnoWon 20
W#1 DoublesDipen Vyas / Josh Jones vs Stephen Holmes / Jeff Choi6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKaiwal Patel / Raj Butalia vs Stephen Fu / Alex Piasecki6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-04-07vs *5-GDichter-CHTC-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesEthan Holston / Tevin Wilson vs Gabriel Dichter / Zachary Osofsky1-6, 1-6
2024-03-17vs *4-JZhou-EnoLost 12
L#1 DoublesRaj Butalia / Michael Muller vs Jonathan Zhou / Jeffrey Zhou1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesTevin Wilson vs Joe Park6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDipen Vyas / Jonathan Surrency vs Telmo Llanga / Ari Farber2-6, 3-6
2024-03-10vs *6-JByrd-EnoLost 02
L#1 DoublesRaj Butalia / Ethan Holston vs Kwame Owens / Joshua Collins1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesTevin Wilson / Richard Griffin vs Nicholas Lau / Chris Culver2-6, 6-7
2024-03-03vs *7-DKhamphasong-CHTCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTevin Wilson / Dipen Vyas vs JOE BERTON / Wendell Gilland3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRaj Butalia / Jonathan Surrency vs Steven Lebowitz / Daniel Branston7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 4.0 Men Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Tevin Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 4
3.81
Josh Jones
published
3.53
Raj Butalia
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.46
Dipen Vyas
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Dan Kane
published 3.5
3.22
Ethan Holston
published 3.5
3.22
Jeff Franklin
published
3.13
Richard Millard
published
Jonathan Surrency
published
Siming Mu
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tevin Wilson
131W–78L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.93
Josh Jones
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Raj Butalia
29W–58L career · 4 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.53
4
Dipen Vyas
42W–141L career · 9 lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
3.46
3.5
Dan Kane
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Ethan Holston
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.22
Jeff Franklin
4W–13L career · no lines in 2024
>99%<1%0%
3.22
Richard Millard
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.13
Jonathan Surrency
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Siming Mu
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.