Teams

MISSION HILLS CM7.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 7.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-10-12vs PLEASANTON CM7.5ALost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Mayer / Karthi Mohan vs Selvam Doraisamy / Praveenkumar Davidson4-6, 3-6
2025-09-07vs BAY CLUB SANTA CLARA CM7.5ALost 01
L#2 DoublesSekar Mokachandra / David Mayer vs Jerome Pons / Nalinichandra Penke6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
3.84
Balaji Krishnan
published 4
3.71
Satya Chillara
published
3.65
3.65
Lingqi Wu
published
3.65
Karthi Mohan
published
3.63
Krishna Kuchibhotla
published
3.62
Shankar Ramaiah
published
3.62
Stephen Wu
published
3.59
Jeff Chang
published
3.58
Jinhao Li
published
3.57
Sekar Mokachandra
published
3.45
Aveer Thakur
published 3.5
3.44
Padmakiran K S
published
3.29
Ravindra Rathi
published
3.25
Anuj Kathuria
published 3.5
David Mayer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Kiron Valluri
published
Qichao Wang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Aveer Thakur + Ravindra Rathi314 matchesnot enough data
Aveer Thakur + Jeff Chang213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Balachandra Rangaswamy
33W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Balaji Krishnan
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.84
Satya Chillara
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Chandra Narayanan
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
3.65
Lingqi Wu
9W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.65
Karthi Mohan
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
Krishna Kuchibhotla
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.63
Shankar Ramaiah
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
Stephen Wu
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
Jeff Chang
15W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.59
Jinhao Li
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.58
Sekar Mokachandra
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
3.5
Aveer Thakur
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Padmakiran K S
18W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.44
Ravindra Rathi
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Anuj Kathuria
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
David Mayer
120W–122L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kiron Valluri
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Qichao Wang
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.