Teams

VRavi-DUR

2025 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Men Wknd

9 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-10-05vs KEaton-DURWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrew Thorne / Curtis Schulze vs Mohammad Alimohammadi / Eric White6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAaron Alejandro / Cole del Charco vs Jerry Wang / Ken Eaton3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesVenkat Ravi / Kevin McCarty vs Daud Tareen / Danny Hamrick6-2, 7-5
2025-09-21vs KEaton-DURWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndrew Thorne / Venkat Ravi vs Mohammad Alimohammadi / Daud Tareen6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAaron Alejandro / Kevin McCarty vs Eric White / Jerry Wang6-1, 6-1
2025-09-14vs KEaton-DURSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAaron Alejandro / Curtis Schulze vs Greg Sabin / Eric White6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJason Karsner / Caleb Brantley vs Mohammad Alimohammadi / Daud Tareen3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-08-17vs KEaton-DURSplit 11
L#1 DoublesVenkat Ravi / Matthew Wein vs Ken Eaton / Jerry Wang3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCurtis Schulze / Jason Karsner vs Eric White / Mohammad Alimohammadi6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Combo 5.5 Men Wknd have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Andrew Thorne
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Kevin McCarty
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.58
Matthew Wein
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Aaron Alejandro
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.43
Curtis Schulze
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.41
Venkat Ravi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Caleb Brantley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Cole del Charco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jason Karsner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Wein + Aaron Alejandro1430% games−7.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Andrew Thorne
10W–8L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
Kevin McCarty
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
Matthew Wein
1W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
27%72%<1%
2.58
3
Aaron Alejandro
5W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
67%33%<1%
2.44
3
Curtis Schulze
6W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.43
Venkat Ravi
10W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.41
2.5
Caleb Brantley
3W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Cole del Charco
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jason Karsner
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.