Teams

TCSP-Volley Llamas-Blake

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-05-26vs MI-Rowe/Woo-TzengLost 03
L#1 DoublesKaitlyn Carey / Tess Hart vs Mindy Rowe / Andrea Lott0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCasey Galgon vs Sharon Woo-Tzeng2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLaura Blanchard / Maika D'ambrosi vs Annie Cudney / ISABELLE PETRICEK-VIGNERAS3-6, 4-6
2026-05-18vs CAC/SL-ThielWon 21
W#1 DoublesAmanda Allegre / Nina Mettler vs Janice Thiel / Brenda Havellana6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLaura Blanchard vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesKathy Austin / Casey Galgon vs Carisa Betancourt / Stephanie Heffner1-6, 0-6
2026-05-11vs BC-RozanskiLost 03
L#1 DoublesTamar Blau / Eriko Eckert vs Kara Rozanski / Eliza Cha6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTess Hart vs Sunny Lee0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Blake / Kathy Austin vs Katie Rossmeissl / Jodi Sternoff3-6, 2-6
2026-05-04vs STC-SchmidtWon 21
W#1 DoublesEriko Eckert / Tess Hart vs Regan Hurley / Julie Skerritt5-7, 4-1
W#1 SinglesGina Baird vs Anne Wakefield6-2, 4-4
L#2 DoublesKaitlyn Carey / Casey Galgon vs Jennifer Goodrich / Jamie Rawding6-7, 3-6
2026-04-27vs NWW-ETC-HsuLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmanda Allegre / Gina Baird vs Alicia Arsene / Jeanie Richardson7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJamie Polin vs Jennifer Eng4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesTamar Blau / Ashley Stansbury vs Leslie Kwor / Rachelle Steijn4-6, 2-6
2026-04-06vs ETC-Game Point-PettyLost 12
L#1 DoublesLaura Blanchard / Amanda Allegre vs Janey Petty / Meghan Brown6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEriko Eckert vs Mindy Ziffren-hall2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMaika D'ambrosi / Tamar Blau vs Christine Shigaki / Isi Owoo1-6, 4-6
2026-04-06vs BC-Set Sisters-ForbesWon 21
W#1 DoublesJamie Polin / Gina Baird vs Tamber Angel / Negar Sherkat6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKaitlyn Carey vs Alison Young2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Austin / Tess Hart vs Alberta Faulk / June Franklin6-4, 6-4
2026-03-30vs BAIN-Double the Fun-StillWon 30
W#1 DoublesNina Mettler / Eriko Eckert vs Shannon Fitzgerald / Elizabeth Bergan6-0, 7-5
W#1 SinglesAshley Stansbury vs Jessica Henderson6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTamar Blau / Sarah Blake vs Kathleen Dassel / Jessica Jackson6-3, 6-2
2026-03-23vs HBSQ-Leiser 2.5WLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmanda Allegre / Jamie Polin vs Vanessa Stedman / Ai Holwick6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesKathy Austin vs Erzsebet Van Mieghem0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Blake / Nina Mettler vs Tatiana Mehr / Rebecca Brittle3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.21 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.54
Gina Baird
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.45
Jamie Polin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.42
Amanda Allegre
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.30
Laura Blanchard
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.29
Nina Mettler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.28
Eriko Eckert
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 2.5
Ashley Stansbury
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.22
Maika D'ambrosi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.21
Sarah Blake
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.10
Tamar Blau
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.08
Kaitlyn Carey
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.04
Casey Galgon
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.01
Tess Hart
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
1.77
Kathy Austin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Gina Baird
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%37%63%
2.54
2.5
Jamie Polin
2W–1L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%64%36%
2.45
2.5
Amanda Allegre
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%74%26%
2.42
2.5
Laura Blanchard
7W–20L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.30
Nina Mettler
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.29
2.5
Eriko Eckert
3W–1L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.28
2.5
Ashley Stansbury
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Maika D'ambrosi
2W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.22
Sarah Blake
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.21
Tamar Blau
2W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.10
Kaitlyn Carey
0W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.08
2.5
Casey Galgon
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Tess Hart
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.01
Kathy Austin
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.77

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.