Teams

KY/LOU/RILEY

2022 USTA FALL 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Trey van Cleave
published
3.42
Jonathan Hahn
published
Ethan Wang
published 3.5
3.18
Adam Kirby
published 3.5
3.13
Gung-Min Gie
published 3.5
3.00
Eric Elliott
published 3.5
2.93
Gregory Bernard
published 3
2.83
Patrick Wissing
published
2.79
Tony Hall
published
2.65
Duane Riley
published 3
2.53
Robert Rettger
published
2.52
Robert Gunnell
published
Mark Kaminski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gung-Min Gie + Patrick Wissing1433% games−11.6% vs expected
Duane Riley + Patrick Wissing224 matchesnot enough data
Adam Kirby + Jonathan Hahn134 matchesnot enough data
Gung-Min Gie + Eric Elliott134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trey van Cleave
25W–14L career · no lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
3.58
Jonathan Hahn
38W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Ethan Wang
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Adam Kirby
19W–36L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Gung-Min Gie
28W–55L career · no lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Eric Elliott
23W–40L career · no lines in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.00
3
Gregory Bernard
17W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
2.93
Patrick Wissing
52W–52L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
2.83
Tony Hall
22W–27L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Duane Riley
22W–39L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.65
Robert Rettger
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
2.53
Robert Gunnell
6W–20L career · no lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
2.52
Mark Kaminski
18W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.