Teams

LSHU-Hudson/ Jetton Sat 18+ 3.5

2025 Lake USTA 18 & Over League · Men 3.5 Saturday

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-05-10vs LJHI-Hibbeler/RRCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesRichard Fogel / Steve Hogg vs Newell Daly / Jay Harris6-4, 6-4
2025-05-06vs LJLA-Lands/NMPLost 12
L#1 DoublesMatthew Newton / David Fuerst vs Robert Ageenko / Graham Wald0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesBen Holden vs Patrick Needham7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGreg Battalia / Steve Hogg vs Chris Mexcur / Hunter Noldin6-1, 6-4
2025-05-03vs LMCR-Crutch/NMP/3.5 18+Lost 03
L#1 SinglesBen Holden vs Logan Stanton3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Fuerst / Scott Hudson vs Dewey Baker / Brian Martens2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGreg Battalia / Steve Hogg vs Bradley Bolick / Dave Dehn0-6, 3-6
2025-04-05vs LMHE-Herrmann/Peninsula Club 18+Won 10
W#1 SinglesBen Holden vs Jarrad Miah7-5, 6-0
W#1 SinglesBen Holden vs Brett Schmerge6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSteve Hogg / Jeff Clay vs Armand Norelli / Peter Norelli7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesScott Smith / Ian Leemans vs Stephen Phillips / Richard Regruto6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2025-03-22vs LJFE-Fernandez-NMP 18+ 3.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDavid Fuerst / Jeff Clay vs Timothy Vallejos / Brad Hamilton6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-03-15vs LJHI-Hibbeler/RRCCLost 01
L#2 DoublesIan Leemans / David Fuerst vs Dimitris Papageorgiou / Newell Daly2-6, 1-6
2025-03-08vs LMCR-Crutch/NMP/3.5 18+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesBen Holden / Matthew Newton vs Dave Dehn / Phil Harrington1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDavid Fuerst / Steve Hogg vs Michael Crutchfield / Chris Harrington6-3, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.5 Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Ben Holden
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.40
Jeff Clay
published
3.05
Steve Hogg
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.95
Ian Leemans
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.92
Richard Fogel
published
2.83
Greg Battalia
published
2.74
David Fuerst
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Fuerst + Steve Hogg6949% games+9.9% vs expected
Ben Holden + Steve Hogg4254% gamesnot enough data
Ben Holden + David Fuerst2350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ben Holden
107W–71L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
3.45
Jeff Clay
37W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.40
3
Steve Hogg
50W–56L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
3.5
Ian Leemans
10W–23L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
Richard Fogel
10W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Greg Battalia
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
88%12%<1%
2.83
3
David Fuerst
46W–75L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.