Teams

Je.Wolborsky40C

2025 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 6.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-06vs Sa.Highsmith40CLost 03
L#1 DoublesEvelyn Andino / Wendy Sielaty vs Jillian Good / Alison Uthe0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJill Salstrand / Mary Strothmann vs Ashley Gaylord / Anna Goodmon1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Wolborsky / Marie Gelston vs Harriet Mills / Janna Myers1-6, 5-7
2025-10-01vs El.Black40CLost 12
W#1 DoublesNgoc Tran / Patty Parrnelli vs Vanese Clough / Linda Blevins6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesWendy Christensen / Wendy Sielaty vs Anna Jones / Neepa Patel5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMarie Gelston / Jennifer Wolborsky vs Jeannette Brown / Jacqueline Morgan6-7, 1-6
2025-09-24vs An.Pleasants40CLost 03
L#1 DoublesWendy Christensen / Paige Alford vs Diane Allen / Lisa DeMarco0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDiane Abourisk / Lora Barnett vs Ashley Walton / Melissa Green0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMarie Gelston / Wendy Sielaty vs Tara Spina / Cathy Werder4-6, 3-6
2025-09-10vs Ka.Wakeford40CWon 30
W#1 DoublesNgoc Tran / Patty Parrnelli vs Lindsey Howard / Lauren Margulies4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesWendy Christensen / Paige Alford vs Lindsey Taylor / Kellie Chesson6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEvelyn Andino / Lora Barnett vs Sarah Bell / Laura Simson6-1, 6-7, 1-0
2025-09-03vs Kr.Esham40CLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Wolborsky / Marie Gelston vs Margaret Ann Gonella / Marlea Ward2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJill Dykes / Diane Abourisk vs Kristin Esham / Elisabeth Van Order3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMary Strothmann / Jill Salstrand vs Kathryn Shields / Kimberly Durland6-7, 5-7
2025-08-27vs Jo.Zorzi40CLost 12
W#1 DoublesNaomi Rodrigues / Patty Parrnelli vs Mary Jo Nugent / Lauren Hardwick6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesEvelyn Andino / Lora Barnett vs Julee Knight / Sarah Kingery4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesWendy Christensen / Marie Gelston vs Gwen Noble / Janet Hammond0-6, 3-6
2025-08-20vs Te.Paschaloudis40CLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Wolborsky / Ngoc Tran vs Teressa Paschaloudis / Debra Neville6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNaomi Rodrigues / Paige Alford vs Chandler Bastian / Shelly Rogers6-0, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMarie Gelston / Wendy Christensen vs Amanda Dawson / Tina Jones1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Naomi Rodrigues
published
3.25
Diane Abourisk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Patty Parrnelli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Paige Alford
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.03
Evelyn Andino
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Mary Strothmann
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.95
Marie Gelston
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.90
Jennifer Wolborsky
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.90
Lora Barnett
published
2.87
Jill Salstrand
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Jill Dykes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.78
Wendy Sielaty
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Wendy Christensen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Sielaty + Patty Parrnelli3345% games+4.7% vs expected
Evelyn Andino + Jennifer Wolborsky3945% games+1.6% vs expected
Wendy Sielaty + Marie Gelston272450% games+0.9% vs expected
Patty Parrnelli + Marie Gelston9457% games−0.6% vs expected
Marie Gelston + Jennifer Wolborsky332651% games−1.7% vs expected
Patty Parrnelli + Mary Strothmann5249% games−2.4% vs expected
Jill Salstrand + Mary Strothmann91050% games−3.4% vs expected
Paige Alford + Jennifer Wolborsky5943% games−3.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Naomi Rodrigues
40W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Diane Abourisk
104W–136L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Patty Parrnelli
160W–112L career · 3 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Paige Alford
121W–138L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Evelyn Andino
67W–150L career · 3 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Mary Strothmann
111W–114L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Marie Gelston
215W–161L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Jennifer Wolborsky
172W–237L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
Lora Barnett
17W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
2.90
3
Jill Salstrand
71W–77L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Jill Dykes
57W–50L career · 1 line in 2025
1%91%8%
2.81
3
Wendy Sielaty
168W–185L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%5%
2.78
Wendy Christensen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.