Teams

LT

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.10 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-07-01Won 21
W#1 DoublesDeborah Lockwood / Candace Cartwright vs Marcia Stauter / Jacalyn Petersen3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJanice Sale / Cathy Simocko-Smith vs Lisa Martin / Sarah Leonard5-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMary Rogers / Tina Spicer vs Maka Hammock / Rene Moore6-2, 6-4
2022-06-24vs FHCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesDeborah Lockwood / Candace Cartwright vs Elizabeth Ugalde / Laura Liotino6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLeslie Walker / Janice Sale vs Barbara Dingwall / Sue Hintz-Siegrist6-3, 6-2
2022-06-17vs HMTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathy Carlson / Cathy Simocko-Smith vs Vivian Watson / Ingrid Parsons4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesChristine Roby / Cristine Carpenter vs Teresa Adsit / Kelley Knudson7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2022-06-10vs MLFWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanice Sale / Tina Spicer vs Sarah Leonard / Lisa Martin4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDeborah Lockwood / Candace Cartwright vs Diane Erickson / Maka Hammock4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChristine Roby / Cristine Carpenter vs Bernita Sterling / Katherine Prudhomme2-6, 6-7
2022-06-03vs FHCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanice Sale / Deborah Lockwood vs Barbara Dingwall / Milena Halek4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLeslie Walker / Cristine Carpenter vs Brenda Laartz / Kris Graham1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMary Rogers / Christine Roby vs Sue Hintz-Siegrist / Susan Kingsley2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-05-27vs HMTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesDeborah Lockwood / Tina Spicer vs Vivian Watson / Linda Berkheim6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLeslie Walker / Janice Sale vs Mary Gabiola / Kelley Knudson6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCristine Carpenter / Leslie Taylor vs Marne Engelking / Ingrid Parsons6-7, 2-6
2022-05-20vs MLFWon 20
W#1 DoublesTina Spicer / Deborah Lockwood vs Jacalyn Petersen / Lori Rasmussen4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCristine Carpenter / Janice Sale vs Wendy Sprague / Susan Prentice6-1, 6-3
2022-05-13vs FHCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesDeborah Lockwood / Tina Spicer vs Elizabeth Ugalde / Pam Smallwood6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJanice Sale / Leslie Walker vs Barbara Dingwall / Sue Hintz-Siegrist1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJessica MacMillan / Leslie Taylor vs Brenda Laartz / Maureen Finn2-6, 0-6
2022-05-06vs HMTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesTina Spicer / Leslie Walker vs Lori Masi / Vivian Watson3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesCristine Carpenter / Janice Sale vs Linda Berkheim / Marcee Gustafson5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLeslie Taylor / Christine Roby vs Mary Gabiola / Ingrid Parsons4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Candace Cartwright
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.05
Cathy Simocko-Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.93
Tina Spicer
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
2.91
Kathy Carlson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Janice Sale
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Deborah Lockwood
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.66
Cristine Carpenter
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Christine Roby
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Jessica MacMillan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janice Sale + Cristine Carpenter8553% games+9.3% vs expected
Tina Spicer + Deborah Lockwood9160% games+6.4% vs expected
Janice Sale + Tina Spicer9554% games−2.4% vs expected
Janice Sale + Deborah Lockwood3352% gamesnot enough data
Janice Sale + Cathy Simocko-Smith4162% gamesnot enough data
Cathy Simocko-Smith + Deborah Lockwood5063% gamesnot enough data
Tina Spicer + Cristine Carpenter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Candace Cartwright
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Cathy Simocko-Smith
42W–27L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.05
Tina Spicer
56W–30L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%71%28%
2.93
Kathy Carlson
31W–23L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%76%24%
2.91
3
Janice Sale
95W–103L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Deborah Lockwood
35W–17L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Cristine Carpenter
24W–29L career · 6 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
2.66
Christine Roby
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jessica MacMillan
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.