Teams

JMontague-DUR

2025 Eno River Fall Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over 4.0 Men Evening

8 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-12-03vs EMalesky-DFCLost 02
L#1 SinglesChristopher Green vs Rod Snyder2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJosh MacIver vs Wilkins Aquino3-6, 3-6
2025-11-13Split 11
L#2 SinglesBarry Gooch vs Daniel Allen5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 SinglesConor Kregecz vs Jack Quigley6-2, 6-0
2025-11-12vs DVyas-DURWon 20
W#2 SinglesConor Kregecz vs Michael Young6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesBarry Gooch vs Jonathan Surrency6-3, 6-0
2025-10-22vs TTran-DURWon 10
W#1 SinglesChristopher Green vs Kyle Faltisco3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-15Won 10
W#1 SinglesBarry Gooch vs Michael Sander6-3, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 4.0 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Barry Gooch
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 4
David Schumann
published 4
3.73
Christopher Green
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.66
Rick Leib
published 4
3.64
Josh MacIver
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.63
Mark Petersen
published
3.60
Conor Kregecz
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 3.5
3.36
JAMES MONTAGUE
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rick Leib + Conor Kregecz213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barry Gooch
112W–109L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.79
4
David Schumann
1W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Christopher Green
24W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Rick Leib
32W–26L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Josh MacIver
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
3.64
Mark Petersen
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Conor Kregecz
69W–28L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.60
JAMES MONTAGUE
17W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%15%
3.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.