Teams

GSCC PINK

2022 CTA WOMEN'S DAYTIME DOUBLES - ASPEN · MOUNTAINS

7 players · average NTRP 3.33 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-09-09vs GSCC BLACKLost 12
L#1 DoublesMeghan Hegberg / Brady Emens vs Miranda Wagler / Mary Boyd2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesHeidi Paul / Alexandra Braeger vs Jenell Hilderbrand / Erin Zalinski6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKeely Eberly / Danielle Malone vs Stacey Adams / Kate McRaith0-6, 1-6
2022-08-05vs GSCC BLACKLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlexandra Braeger / Heidi Paul vs Jenell Hilderbrand / Stacey Adams2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMeghan Hegberg / Nancy Nordell vs Kate McRaith / Michele Derosa6-3, 3-1
2022-07-29vs GSCC BLACKLost 01
L#2 DoublesBrady Emens / Heidi Paul vs Miranda Wagler / Mary Boyd1-6, 2-6
2022-07-15vs HOME PINKLost 01
L#1 DoublesHeidi Paul / Alexandra Braeger vs Deborah Griffin / Deborah Long2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-06-24vs HOME PINKLost 02
L#2 DoublesBrady Emens / Nancy Nordell vs Meg Segerberg / Deborah Long0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesDanielle Malone / Keely Eberly vs Jill Moneypenny / Melinda Brown0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Alexandra Braeger
published 3.5
3.29
Meghan Hegberg
published 3.5
3.27
Heidi Paul
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.05
Keely Eberly
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.93
Brady Emens
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Danielle Malone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Nancy Nordell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Meghan Hegberg + Brady Emens5748% games+8.7% vs expected
Heidi Paul + Alexandra Braeger7452% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Nordell + Brady Emens1532% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alexandra Braeger
72W–36L career · no lines in 2022
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Meghan Hegberg
59W–52L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Heidi Paul
38W–53L career · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Keely Eberly
41W–78L career · 2 lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
3.05
3
Brady Emens
25W–58L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Danielle Malone
12W–21L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Nordell
6W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.