Teams

Causing a Racket

2024 Adult 18 and Over League · 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.86 / EAST HAWAII

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-07-14vs Racquet RebelsLost 13
W#1 DoublesRhonda Zavarro / Teresa Doak vs Marissa Hayashi / Callie Oyama6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesJudith Jennet vs Alyssa Okamura1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSheila Tamura / Michelle Oishi vs Sheri Kinoshita / Alexandra Alcisto4-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesMari Iwata vs Lori Nekoba3-6, 1-6
2024-06-29vs Racquet RebelsSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMichelle Oishi / Rhonda Zavarro vs Donna Shibuya / Mari Horike2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesDeborah Hashimoto-Skorikov vs Lori Nekoba6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesHanna Wilson / Teresa Doak vs Tomoko Sakishima / Liane Martin2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJudith Jennet vs Callie Oyama6-1, 6-3
2024-06-16vs Racquet RebelsSplit 22
W#1 DoublesSheila Tamura / Hanna Wilson vs Mari Horike / Donna Shibuya4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJENNY NISHIDA vs Erin Byrne1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMari Iwata / Karyn Tada vs Liane Martin / Sheri Kinoshita1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesMichelle Oishi / Rhonda Zavarro vs Callie Oyama / Lori Nekoba6-1, 6-3
2024-05-26vs Racquet RebelsSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDeborah Hashimoto-Skorikov / Rhonda Zavarro vs Sheri Kinoshita / Marissa Hayashi0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesMari Iwata vs Alyssa Okamura3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSheila Tamura / Karyn Tada vs Mari Horike / Donna Shibuya4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 SinglesJENNY NISHIDA vs Callie Oyama6-1, 6-1
2024-05-19vs Racquet RebelsLost 12
L#1 DoublesDeborah Hashimoto-Skorikov / Hanna Wilson vs Lori Nekoba / Erin Byrne1-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJudith Jennet vs Alexandra Alcisto4-6, 3-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Oishi / JENNY NISHIDA vs Marissa Hayashi / Tomoko Sakishima5-7, 3-6
2024-05-12vs Racquet RebelsLost 13
L#1 DoublesKaryn Tada / Deborah Hashimoto-Skorikov vs Tomoko Sakishima / Donna Shibuya6-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesHiromi Saito vs Alyssa Okamura6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJENNY NISHIDA / Michelle Oishi vs Marissa Hayashi / Liane Martin7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMari Iwata vs Alexandra Alcisto4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Marissa Hayashi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.85
JENNY NISHIDA
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.79
Sheri Kinoshita
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.77
Karyn Tada
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.76
Teresa Doak
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Hiromi Saito
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.65
Deborah Hashimoto-Skorikov
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4
3.59
Sheila Tamura
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.56
Judith Jennet
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.50
Michelle Oishi
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.26
Hanna Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
Mari Iwata
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Rhonda Zavarro
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Oishi + Teresa Doak3350% games+3.5% vs expected
Sheri Kinoshita + Marissa Hayashi13955% games+1.7% vs expected
Rhonda Zavarro + Teresa Doak5254% games+0.2% vs expected
Sheri Kinoshita + Teresa Doak6157% games−3.8% vs expected
Deborah Hashimoto-Skorikov + Karyn Tada6750% games−7.0% vs expected
Rhonda Zavarro + Sheila Tamura1542% gamesnot enough data
Sheri Kinoshita + Karyn Tada314 matchesnot enough data
Karyn Tada + Teresa Doak224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Marissa Hayashi
110W–54L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
JENNY NISHIDA
29W–21L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%86%13%
3.85
4
Sheri Kinoshita
179W–143L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Karyn Tada
51W–56L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Teresa Doak
66W–46L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
3.5
Hiromi Saito
103W–69L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%5%95%
3.71
4
Deborah Hashimoto-Skorikov
37W–38L career · 4 lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Sheila Tamura
33W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%24%76%
3.59
4
Judith Jennet
125W–106L career · 3 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.56
4
Michelle Oishi
30W–45L career · 5 lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.50
3.5
Hanna Wilson
83W–106L career · 8 lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.26
Mari Iwata
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Rhonda Zavarro
19W–39L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.