Teams

Iranshad

2022 Montgomery Adult 18 & Over Spring · Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 5.0 Men

6 players · average NTRP 4.75 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-06-28vs LieberWon 10
W#2 DoublesHouston Ward / Byron Levy vs Michael Mironchenko / Albert Hsieh6-4, 6-2
2022-06-26vs LieberWon 10
W#2 DoublesJuan Borga / Byron Levy vs Matthew Geppi / Jason Edmonds7-6, 6-3
2022-06-20vs LieberLost 01
L#1 SinglesByron Levy vs Michael Mironchenko1-6, 0-6
2022-06-14vs LieberWon 10
W#2 DoublesByron Levy / Michael Liu vs Thomas Jeffers / Matthew Modderno6-1, 6-2
2022-05-31vs LieberLost 01
L#1 DoublesBarghav Hariharan / Byron Levy vs Michael Steinberg / Matthew Geppi6-7, 3-6
2022-05-24vs LieberLost 01
L#1 SinglesByron Levy vs Michael Mironchenko0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 18 & Over 5.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.37 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.81
Hayan Marouf
published 5
4.46
Mehrban Iranshad
published 5
4.32
Barghav Hariharan
published 4.5
4.17
Byron Levy
usually #1 Singles 30%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 4.5
4.09
John Olson
published
Juan Borga
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Hayan Marouf
10W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.81
5
Mehrban Iranshad
126W–72L career · no lines in 2022
61%39%<1%
4.46
4.5
Barghav Hariharan
14W–12L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Byron Levy
145W–119L career · 10 lines in 2022
10%90%1%
4.17
John Olson
7W–13L career · no lines in 2022
23%76%<1%
4.09
Juan Borga
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.