Teams

DVliet (Raintree)

2024 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-19vs CJensen/CDelorenzo (Ballantyne)Won 10
W#3 DoublesTanya Ormand / Sybil Cioffi vs Jigisha Thaker / Kathleen Stepp6-2, 7-6
2024-04-12vs KCrane (Palisades)Won 20
W#2 DoublesSybil Cioffi / Shelby Stahl vs Cecile Yager / Kelli Crane6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTanya Ormand / Taylor Dries vs Joy Landesman / Rene Ernest6-2, 6-1
2024-03-22vs STroni (OPRC)Won 10
W#3 DoublesTaylor Dries / Tanya Ormand vs Alyce Lofgren / Merrill McCreary6-4, 6-2
2024-03-21vs SHicks/WSolomon (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTanya Ormand / Bonnie Sheppard vs Maria Mascia / Amy Elaasar2-6, 2-6
2024-03-08vs KWahr/DDiPangrazio (Carmel)Won 10
W#2 DoublesDonna Savage / Sybil Cioffi vs Dorian Dipangrazio / Ani Bashian7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Taylor Dries
published
Denise Vliet
published 4
3.74
Vanessa Elias
published
3.58
Robin Caruso
published
3.55
Eileen Donohue
published
3.52
Jeanette Kantor
published
3.44
Bonnie Sheppard
published 3.5
3.39
Judith Skelton
published
3.33
Shelby Stahl
published
3.29
Donna Savage
published
Sybil Cioffi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Tanya Ormand
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Karen Brooks
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vanessa Elias + Eileen Donohue3254% games+2.0% vs expected
Eileen Donohue + Robin Caruso4345% games−4.1% vs expected
Tanya Ormand + Taylor Dries2347% games−4.4% vs expected
Eileen Donohue + Tanya Ormand044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Taylor Dries
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Denise Vliet
13W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Vanessa Elias
15W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
Robin Caruso
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.58
Eileen Donohue
45W–61L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.55
Jeanette Kantor
8W–9L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.52
3.5
Bonnie Sheppard
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
Judith Skelton
20W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.39
Shelby Stahl
11W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
Donna Savage
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Sybil Cioffi
28W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Tanya Ormand
42W–55L career · 4 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
Karen Brooks
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.