Teams

Rutland/18/5.5/CW/LCRC

2026 Lake Charles Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women · 5.5 LC (18&O) Women

9 players · average NTRP / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 13 2:00 PM
Lake Charles Racquet Club
Sep 27 2:00 PM
Graywood Golf & Racquet Club
Oct 18 5:00 PM
Lake Charles Racquet Club
Oct 20 6:00 PM
Ward 3 Recreation Tennis Complex
2026-08-30vs Tyler/18/5.5/CW/LCRCLost 02
L#2 DoublesEmily Pierce / MacY Dulany vs Autumn Taylor / Dawn Redd6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesHaley Bordelon / Lori Hale vs Danielle Nava / Jennifer Sproles4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-08-23vs Brescher/Faul/18/5.5/CW/GWLost 03
L#1 DoublesDominique Noel Chaisson / Paige Daboval vs Jennifer Black / Laurie Callaba1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSara Prudhomme / Rachel Bargas vs Maria Faul / Emmie Gonsoulin3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesLori Hale / Haley Bordelon vs Shelly Brescher / Anitra Mouton0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 5.5 LC (18&O) Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Tyler/18/5.5/CW/LCRC1021320
2Rutland/18/5.5/CW/LCRC000000
3Brescher/Faul/18/5.5/CW/GW0112432

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.37 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.67
Lori Hale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Tiffany Rutland
published
2.49
Rachel Bargas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.23
Sara Prudhomme
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.17
Haley Bordelon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.05
MacY Dulany
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Dominique Noel Chaisson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Goodwin
published
Paige Daboval
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tiffany Rutland + Lori Hale134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Hale
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.67
Tiffany Rutland
11W–22L career · no lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
2.62
Rachel Bargas
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49
Sara Prudhomme
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
97%3%<1%
2.23
Haley Bordelon
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
MacY Dulany
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Dominique Noel Chaisson
6W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Elizabeth Goodwin
2W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Paige Daboval
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.