Teams

MBYC Tennis Armada 18+ 3.0 Day

2026 18&Over Women's SUMMER DAY LEAGUE · 3.0 Day

19 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-07-10vs The Pelham Forever Ins 18+ 3.0 DaySplit 22
W#1 DoublesFinola Hurley / Veronica Barnes vs Chandra Turner / Evgenia Goncharova2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesTina Schwartz vs Svetlana Maisheva4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesKatherine Nannizzi / Tara Pisani vs Esther Lomas Sampedro / Olivia Donovan6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLINDSAY NAZE / Cathy Lee vs Jamie Huggler / Heather Hemsley1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#1 DoublesTara Pisani / Bridget Bennett vs Wendy Sayles / Stephanie Secchia6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesTina Schwartz vs Susan Barnes-Girling4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesFinola Hurley / Katherine Nannizzi vs Maryann Guthrie / Johanna Snyder6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesVeronica Barnes / Sarah Ryan vs Michelle Cohn / Jennifer Leeper6-4, 6-1
W#1 DoublesBridget Bennett / Katherine Nannizzi vs Dorathy Sunshine / Karryn Angoff6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAndrea Johnson vs Jordana Haber6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLINDSAY NAZE / Sarah Ryan vs Lindsay Gourevitch / Jenya Reinglass0-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMelissa Heery / Celine Dujeux vs Jilliann Elliott / Natalie Green2-6, 6-6
2026-05-29vs NYAC Lovely Ladies 18+ 3.0 DayWon 31
W#1 DoublesFinola Hurley / Tara Pisani vs Lynette Duffell / Claire Gallagher6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBridget Bennett vs Alexandra Corsi6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMaureen Winner / Katherine Nannizzi vs Stacy Gatto / Colleen Zale4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesAndrea Johnson / Kristen Paolercio vs Maureen Nash / Donna Henry6-1, 6-1
2026-05-22vs NRRC Full Metal Rackets 18+3.0 DayLost 13
L#1 DoublesFinola Hurley / Katherine Nannizzi vs Jenna Dedic / Taylor Chesney1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBridget Bennett vs Jen Turner-Finley3-6, 5-6
W#2 DoublesVeronica Barnes / Sarah Ryan vs Megan Watkins / Megan Jeffry6-2, 7-6
L#3 DoublesCeline Dujeux / Brooke Brandt vs Jennifer Ross / Kirsten Saetre4-6, 1-6
2026-05-15vs Sportime LI 18+ 3.0 DayWon 31
W#1 DoublesFinola Hurley / Bridget Bennett vs Tina Reiser / Angelika Leissl6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesArjan Eenkema van Dijk vs Camela Morrissey6-3, 6-5
L#2 DoublesAndrea Johnson / Alexis Daur vs Marion Ferraro / Deborah Bharucha4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMelissa Heery / Cathy Lee vs Karen Regan / Sally Cantwell6-0, 6-2
W#1 DoublesFinola Hurley / Katherine Nannizzi vs Chandra Turner / Ingrid Mudge6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMaureen Winner vs Svetlana Maisheva4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLINDSAY NAZE / Andrea Johnson vs Esther Lomas Sampedro / Olivia Donovan6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKristen Paolercio / Celine Dujeux vs Rachel Tulchin / Liz Farrell6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesBridget Bennett / Finola Hurley vs Amanda Michael / Susan Barnes-Girling6-3, 6-6
L#1 SinglesArjan Eenkema van Dijk vs Mila Burns1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKatherine Nannizzi / Maureen Winner vs Wendy Sayles / Dana Post3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Ryan / Alexis Daur vs Johanna Snyder / Stephanie Secchia4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Bridget Bennett
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.89
Finola Hurley
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.82
Katherine Nannizzi
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
2.78
Tara Pisani
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.77
Una Dean
published
Alexis Daur
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.63
Andrea Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.60
Cathy Lee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
LINDSAY NAZE
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.56
Brooke Brandt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Celine Dujeux
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.52
Maureen Winner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.50
Veronica Barnes
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.41
Arjan Eenkema van Dijk
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.31
Kristen Paolercio
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.29
Denise Mathieson
published 3
2.21
Melissa Heery
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sarah Ryan
published
Tina Schwartz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bridget Bennett + Tara Pisani6262% games+10.4% vs expected
Andrea Johnson + Kristen Paolercio5261% games+5.0% vs expected
Finola Hurley + Bridget Bennett222549% games+1.2% vs expected
Finola Hurley + Tara Pisani6356% games−0.9% vs expected
Finola Hurley + Katherine Nannizzi2446% games−3.0% vs expected
LINDSAY NAZE + Maureen Winner6062% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Heery + Celine Dujeux3256% gamesnot enough data
Kristen Paolercio + Veronica Barnes5063% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Bridget Bennett
139W–105L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Finola Hurley
207W–155L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
Katherine Nannizzi
34W–21L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
2.82
Tara Pisani
33W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Una Dean
9W–6L career · no lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Alexis Daur
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Andrea Johnson
22W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
3
Cathy Lee
21W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
LINDSAY NAZE
25W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59
3
Brooke Brandt
12W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
34%66%<1%
2.56
3
Celine Dujeux
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
Maureen Winner
34W–51L career · 3 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
Veronica Barnes
32W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%49%51%
2.50
3
Arjan Eenkema van Dijk
13W–23L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
74%26%<1%
2.41
Kristen Paolercio
21W–15L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.31
3
Denise Mathieson
16W–29L career · no lines in 2026
93%7%<1%
2.29
Melissa Heery
10W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%98%2%
2.21
Sarah Ryan
8W–17L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Tina Schwartz
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.