Teams

CDTA S Combo Mix 7.5X Wheaton (Out) Isphording Sat 2 $17

CDTA Summer Combo Mixed · CDTA Combo Mixed 7.5X Summer

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesDavid Isphording / Leigh Champagne vs Eileen Lee / Carlos Waldron6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 DoublesCate Barnes / David Isphording vs Joseph Zabat / Denise Lam4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAnthony Noti / Joan Labue vs Elleson Song / Gregg Rousseau1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesChristopher Garcia / Julie Rusin vs Christine Campanelli / Jorge Trejo3-6, 5-7
2022-07-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesJulie Rusin / David Isphording vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesCate Barnes / David Isphording vs Abagail Frasco / Peter Wang4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 DoublesCate Barnes / Brian Green vs Tsuyoshi Yamazaki / Yumi Ida6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDavid Isphording / Cate Barnes vs Emily Lund / Igor Gogov5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMarilyn Tansey / Kevin Onorato vs Matthew Arceo / Catie Hughes6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDavid Isphording / Stephanie Dixon vs Gregory Meyer / Linda Meyer6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CDTA Combo Mixed 7.5X Summer have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Joshua Luetkehans
published
3.84
Anthony Noti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Marilyn Tansey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
Brian Green
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Cate Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.67
Leigh Champagne
published
3.64
David Isphording
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.58
Shelley Reese
published
3.58
Julie Rusin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Kelcei Glasgow
published
3.45
Joan Labue
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Chelsea Medina
published
Christopher Garcia
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jason Richardson
published
Kevin Onorato
published
Stephanie Dixon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cate Barnes + David Isphording3350% gamesnot enough data
Joshua Luetkehans + Chelsea Medina314 matchesnot enough data
Shelley Reese + Kevin Onorato213 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Dixon + Kevin Onorato123 matchesnot enough data
Joan Labue + David Isphording123 matchesnot enough data
Julie Rusin + Brian Green123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joshua Luetkehans
56W–22L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
4.41
4
Anthony Noti
32W–30L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Marilyn Tansey
216W–144L career · 1 line in 2022
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Brian Green
34W–18L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
4
Cate Barnes
37W–27L career · 4 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.72
Leigh Champagne
65W–28L career · no lines in 2022
<1%10%90%
3.67
4
David Isphording
105W–129L career · 6 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Shelley Reese
49W–34L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
Julie Rusin
59W–24L career · 1 line in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
Kelcei Glasgow
57W–21L career · no lines in 2022
<1%34%66%
3.55
Joan Labue
27W–27L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
Chelsea Medina
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Christopher Garcia
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Jason Richardson
16W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kevin Onorato
32W–19L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephanie Dixon
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.