Teams

Jordan: TBC V1

2025 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 4.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-11vs Gramins/Kadelbach Winter 2025Won 41
W#1 DoublesJulian Bannach / Ramon Villanueva vs Steve Gramins / Peter Tanis6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesConnor Remington vs Boyd Miller4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJames Hwang / Senan Kelly vs Scott Lucas / Tim Theisen6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesPreston Husom vs Fei Li6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJustin Guimond / Quang Nystrom vs Jim Brown / Thomas James6-4, 6-1
L#1 DoublesJulian Bannach / Ramon Villanueva vs Matthew Knutson / Jonathan Riermann7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSam Jordan / Connor Remington vs Barrett HIndt / Kristopher Birch6-7, 3-6
W#2 SinglesTimothy Ohtake vs Steven Swanberg6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesDavid Wareham / Justin Guimond vs Jon Kruse / Remus Baias6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-01-21vs Gramins/Kadelbach Winter 2025Lost 13
L#1 DoublesSam Jordan / Ramon Villanueva vs Del Bauers / Boyd Miller2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#1 SinglesPreston Husom vs Steve Gramins6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDaniel Crouser / Quang Nystrom vs Scott Krohn / Peter Tanis5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesPaul Jilek / David Wareham vs Thomas James / Jim Brown6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Timothy Ohtake
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.93
Preston Husom
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.85
Julian Bannach
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.82
Paul Jilek
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.81
Senan Kelly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.80
Quang Nystrom
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.80
Ramon Villanueva
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
David Wareham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Justin Guimond
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Daniel Crouser
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Connor Remington
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.60
James Hwang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
Sam Jordan
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Connor Remington + James Hwang4255% games+12.8% vs expected
Justin Guimond + Quang Nystrom6361% games−1.3% vs expected
Ramon Villanueva + Julian Bannach10951% games−1.5% vs expected
Ramon Villanueva + Quang Nystrom5055% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Crouser + David Wareham224 matchesnot enough data
Justin Guimond + Ramon Villanueva123 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Crouser + James Hwang033 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Crouser + Quang Nystrom213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Timothy Ohtake
41W–24L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
3.94
Preston Husom
18W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.93
Julian Bannach
33W–18L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
Paul Jilek
33W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
3.82
Senan Kelly
19W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Quang Nystrom
27W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
Ramon Villanueva
38W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
David Wareham
13W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Justin Guimond
14W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Daniel Crouser
21W–28L career · 1 line in 2025
5%94%1%
3.72
4
Connor Remington
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
4
James Hwang
7W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.60
Sam Jordan
5W–4L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.