Teams

H8 Raintree Houff

2024 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Men · Richmond Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-08vs C3 Salisbury-RiegelWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrad Houff / Carey Donovan vs Michael Blackburn / Jeff Brown6-1, 6-4
2024-08-01vs A1 Old Westwood Whackers - PayneWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrad Houff / Stuart Dowdy vs Bryan Carr / James Faulstich6-3, 6-2
2024-07-18vs D4 MRTC THORNTONWon 10
W#3 DoublesBrad Houff / Ken Patterson vs Edward Thornton / Donald Hoover6-1, 6-3
2024-07-11vs B2 CCV Strickler - HancockWon 20
W#2 DoublesHenry Wood / Edward Yesbeck vs Fred McGlynn / Tom Cricchi6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBrad Houff / Stuart Dowdy vs Tommy Thompson / Charles Makepeace7-5, 6-4
2024-07-03vs Mid-Atlantic/Stephens/55&Over8.0MLost 01
L#3 DoublesHolland Gravely / Edward Yesbeck vs James Holland / Don Busick3-6, 6-7
2024-06-27vs E5 Belmont Big Nasty - PfeifferLost 01
L#1 DoublesStuart Dowdy / Edward Yesbeck vs Jeff Bosch / William Crowe1-6, 2-6
2024-06-20vs C3 Salisbury-RiegelWon 10
W#3 DoublesEdward Yesbeck / Thomas Webb vs Jeff Brown / Taylor Clarke6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.91
Eddie Parker
published
3.85
Holland Gravely
published
3.82
Henry Wood
published
3.82
ED Fuhr
published
3.78
Geoff Campbell
published
3.74
Ken Patterson
published
3.66
Seunghun Ok
published
3.66
Carey Donovan
published 4
3.64
Edward Yesbeck
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.59
Brad Houff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.30
Stuart Dowdy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eddie Parker + ED Fuhr5158% games−5.4% vs expected
Brad Houff + Edward Yesbeck3253% gamesnot enough data
Ken Patterson + Henry Wood134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eddie Parker
8W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.91
Holland Gravely
21W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
Henry Wood
13W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
ED Fuhr
6W–1L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.82
Geoff Campbell
14W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Ken Patterson
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
Seunghun Ok
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Carey Donovan
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.66
4
Edward Yesbeck
127W–115L career · 4 lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Brad Houff
114W–106L career · 4 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
Stuart Dowdy
15W–11L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.