Teams

Motichek-18/2.5/M/Pelican

2025 Man · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Men

5 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings2 teams · Cov Adult 18 & Over - Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Schulze-18/2.5/M/N.Cypress4111413116
2Motichek-18/2.5/M/Pelican1441125163

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.06 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.06
Eric Tagesen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Joseph Kanode
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Streicher
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tim Barousse
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Travis Motichek
usually #2 Doubles 31%, also #1 Doubles 31% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Eric Tagesen
1W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Joseph Kanode
0W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Streicher
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tim Barousse
3W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Travis Motichek
17W–29L career · 24 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.