Teams

Meadows Pink YaYas

2024 Sarasota Adult 65 & Over Winter · 7.0 W Monday

11 players · average NTRP 3.40 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-11vs Island Walk DeBoerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCindy Morris / Sandra Osborne vs Nancy Dickson / Anne McIntosh6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKaren Matthews / Christa Ruppert vs Gretchen de Boer / Jill Sneider7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2024-03-04vs Payne Park LacroixWon 10
W#1 DoublesCindy Morris / Mary Welch vs Peggy Hite / Joanne Wuelfing6-1, 7-6
2024-02-26vs Courtside IrishSplit 11
W#1 DoublesCindy Morris / Sandra Osborne vs Sally Pym / Dale Cole6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKaren Matthews / Mary Welch vs Mary Lou Irish / Sue Hackney2-6, 2-6
2024-02-12vs Payne Park HallLost 01
L#2 DoublesKaren Matthews / Mary Welch vs Sigi Moriece / JoMarie Privitera1-6, 4-6
2024-02-09vs River Strand KendleWon 20
W#1 DoublesCindy Morris / Sandra Osborne vs Sherri Archondo / Colleen Kendle6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Welch / Karen Matthews vs Leanna Jackson / Sylvia Sethares-Heyl6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2024-01-26vs Sarasota/Curtin/65&Over7.0WWon 10
W#2 DoublesAlice Levine / Karen Matthews vs Joanne Christie / Mary Stein6-2, 6-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Monday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Alice Levine
published 3.5
3.28
Cindy Morris
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Catherine Hynes
published 3.5
2.80
Christa Ruppert
published 3.5
2.79
Becky Pomfret
published 3
Donna Spielberger
published
Joyce Ottinger
published
Julie Harris
published
Karen Matthews
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Mary Welch
published
Sandra Osborne
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Spielberger + Alice Levine5162% gamesnot enough data
Cindy Morris + Karen Matthews033 matchesnot enough data
Becky Pomfret + Catherine Hynes123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alice Levine
44W–30L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.33
3.5
Cindy Morris
42W–30L career · 4 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Catherine Hynes
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.26
3.5
Christa Ruppert
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
2.80
3
Becky Pomfret
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
Donna Spielberger
50W–38L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Joyce Ottinger
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Julie Harris
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Karen Matthews
53W–67L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Welch
3W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sandra Osborne
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.