Teams

Ace Athletics-Bastian

2021 Fall Indoor League-Weekday · 3.0W

13 players · average NTRP 3.42 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-12-08vs Golds Gym-PageWon 20
W#1 Female DoublesMaria Pettit / Emily Hales vs Elizabeth Lohner / Jordan Osborne6-2, 6-4
W#3 Female DoublesLinda Larsen / Deanne Griffiths vs Amie Page / Jessica Larson1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-12-01vs Red Ledges-Overton/MaddoxSplit 11
L#1 Female SinglesJaime Vance vs Cheryl A McCullough4-6, 4-3, 1-0
W#2 Female DoublesJessica Whittaker / Deanne Griffiths vs Carly Johnston / Jen Dagley4-6, 6-5, 1-0
2021-11-17vs Park City MARC-Smith/ByrneLost 12
L#1 Female DoublesKayeLynn BASTIAN / Jessica Whittaker vs Alexis Smith / Cathy Siegal3-6, 0-6
W#1 Female SinglesJaime Vance vs Darla Cardwell6-0, 6-0
L#3 Female DoublesSherrie Hatch / Maria Pettit vs Karen Yocum / Sharon Bush2-6, 4-6
2021-11-11vs Ivory Ridge-McCordWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesJaime Vance / Jennifer Tooley vs Penny McCord / Chris Peterson7-6, 6-0
2021-11-05vs Sports Mall-Majors/JensenWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesMaria Pettit / Emily Hales vs Trisha Cutrer / Kari Majors2-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · 3.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sports Mall-Henderson/Knowlton602225107
2Golds Gym-TC United6019511127
3Ace Athletics-Bastian5016412129
4Park City MARC-Smith/Byrne4113716154
5CMTA @ Liberty Park-Wolfgram4215920166
6CMTA @ Liberty Park-Hurd/Maxfield31142682
7Sunpro-Belliston/Anderson3391531221
8Ivory Ridge-McCord2261021153
9Ogden-Cox/Johnstun2311922183
10RISE AC - Price/Kemp24101430208
11Golds Gym-Page1351124157
12Red Ledges-Overton/Maddox1451531198
13CMTA @ Liberty Park-Mecham000000
14Sports Mall-Majors/Jensen0551534207
15Sports Mall-Rollins/Bradley0521838214
16Salt Lake Tennis-Bickmore0642040255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Jaime Vance
usually #1 Female Singles 67%, also #1 Female Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Emily Hales
published 4
3.20
Jessica Whittaker
published
3.19
Jennifer Tooley
usually #1 Female Doubles 57%, also #2 Female Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.90
Maria Pettit
usually #2 Female Doubles 33%, also #3 Female Doubles 33% · published 3
2.89
Rebecca Harman
published
2.65
KayeLynn BASTIAN
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Deanne Griffiths
usually #2 Female Doubles 50%, also #3 Female Doubles 50% · published 3
2.48
Mary Jane Swalberg
published
Linda Larsen
published
Mary Jayne Child
published
Molly Adams
published
Sherrie Hatch
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Tooley + Jaime Vance8259% games+11.0% vs expected
Jessica Whittaker + Jaime Vance16069% games+9.6% vs expected
Maria Pettit + Sherrie Hatch6357% games+7.4% vs expected
Rebecca Harman + Molly Adams7352% games+6.9% vs expected
KayeLynn BASTIAN + Jaime Vance20364% games+5.3% vs expected
Mary Jayne Child + Molly Adams13857% games+5.1% vs expected
KayeLynn BASTIAN + Maria Pettit5649% games+4.6% vs expected
Jennifer Tooley + Sherrie Hatch3650% games+2.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jaime Vance
176W–62L career · 3 lines in 2021
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Emily Hales
90W–58L career · no lines in 2021
67%33%<1%
3.44
Jessica Whittaker
87W–79L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Jennifer Tooley
198W–228L career · 7 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Maria Pettit
188W–196L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%78%22%
2.90
Rebecca Harman
241W–300L career · no lines in 2021
<1%80%19%
2.89
3
KayeLynn BASTIAN
209W–244L career · 1 line in 2021
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Deanne Griffiths
49W–78L career · type S · 2 lines in 2021
16%83%<1%
2.63
Mary Jane Swalberg
75W–203L career · no lines in 2021
56%44%<1%
2.48
Linda Larsen
18W–32L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mary Jayne Child
50W–107L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Molly Adams
83W–53L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sherrie Hatch
74W–76L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.