Teams

SCC Andrews

2023 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-06-14vs KRA Fleck / WalekWon 10
W#3 DoublesCaroline Andrews / Catherine Baldridge vs Carlyle Walek / Kristy Seredni2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-06-09vs Burkwood JohnsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesCaroline Andrews / Alicia Watkins vs Lynne Read / April Buckles5-7, 2-6
2023-06-07vs Southampton LockhartLost 01
L#2 DoublesCaroline Andrews / Virginia Totaro vs Eileen Cerny / Susan Lockhart4-6, 6-7
2023-06-02vs HCC Ross / BoydWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrittney Watkins / Alicia Watkins vs Lynne Butz / Cameron Sealey6-3, 6-1
2023-05-31vs Westwood AnthonyWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlicia Watkins / Brittney Watkins vs Meghan Dexter / Meredith Schwartz6-4, 6-4
2023-05-26vs Raintree MartinWon 10
W#1 DoublesAlicia Watkins / Brittney Watkins vs Jennifer Morris / Lisa Harmon6-2, 6-4
2023-05-24vs CCV WilliamsWon 20
W#1 DoublesAlicia Watkins / Brittney Watkins vs Mary Beth Scott / Rachel Piacentini6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesCaroline Andrews / Virginia Totaro vs Jan Hatcher / Lisa Makepeace6-2, 6-2
2023-05-19vs WOCC StringerWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrittney Watkins / Alicia Watkins vs Susan Mangin / Cheri Stringer6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Heather Benedetti
published
3.45
Catherine Baldridge
published 3.5
3.38
Alicia Watkins
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.35
Mandy Tornabene
published
3.19
Robin Sorensen
published
3.14
Virginia Totaro
published
3.11
Caroline Andrews
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.08
3.05
Annmarie Strachan
published 3.5
Dorothy Hillgrove
published
Morgan Gleeson
published
Susan Hicklin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Andrews + Alicia Watkins151053% games+4.3% vs expected
Melissa Brunner-Brown + Annmarie Strachan0537% gamesnot enough data
Mandy Tornabene + Catherine Baldridge303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heather Benedetti
30W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%34%66%
3.56
3.5
Catherine Baldridge
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Alicia Watkins
218W–108L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
Mandy Tornabene
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
1%86%14%
3.35
Robin Sorensen
5W–8L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Virginia Totaro
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Caroline Andrews
69W–66L career · 4 lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.11
Melissa Brunner-Brown
11W–22L career · no lines in 2023
28%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Annmarie Strachan
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
37%63%<1%
3.05
Dorothy Hillgrove
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Morgan Gleeson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Hicklin
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.