Teams

Ca.Barker40S

2026 Capital Singles 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-01vs Ro.Harris40SLost 12
W#1 SinglesStephen Arick vs PEDRO J LEON4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJordan Whichard vs Robert Harris7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 SinglesBrad Manning vs Lenny Parrnelli2-6, 2-6
2026-07-18vs An.Collicutt40SWon 21
L#1 SinglesBrad Manning vs Adam Baltzer1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesRonald Elliott vs Jay Ratia6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesBruce Elder vs Brian Fields6-1, 6-3
2026-07-11vs De.Farmer40S3.0Won 21
L#1 SinglesRonald Elliott vs Paul Sherman3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJordan Whichard vs Richard Gibson6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesCam Barker vs Lawrence Pollard6-3, 6-0
2026-06-27vs Br.Pickett40SWon 30
W#1 SinglesTimothy Franklin vs Brian Pickett6-4, 6-1
W#2 SinglesStephen Arick vs Mike Hampton6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 SinglesBruce Elder vs Michael Stanziale6-1, 6-1
2026-06-20vs Ro.Harris40SWon 21
W#1 SinglesTimothy Franklin vs Patrick Dougherty6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesDavid Coman vs Brian Buckingham6-1, 6-0
L#3 SinglesJordan Whichard vs David Dykes3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-06-13vs Pa.Shimp40SWon 30
W#1 SinglesStephen Arick vs Sukh Sandhu3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesRonald Elliott vs Christopher Glass6-3, 6-0
W#3 SinglesCam Barker vs Paul Shimp6-1, 6-1
2026-06-08vs An.Collicutt40SLost 12
L#1 SinglesDavid Coman vs Adam Baltzer2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesBruce Elder vs Jay Williams5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 SinglesBrad Manning vs Eric Striegel3-6, 1-6
2026-06-06vs Br.Ross40SWon 30
W#1 SinglesTimothy Franklin vs Brian Josephs6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesStephen Arick vs Brian Ross6-4, 6-4
W#3 SinglesRonald Elliott vs Drew Douglass6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Ca.Barker40S6217718159
2Br.Ross40S5315921182
3De.Farmer40S3.053131123199
4Br.Pickett40S53121229231
5An.Collicutt40S35111328221
6Ro.Harris40S35101431224
7Pa.Shimp40S1761837235

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Timothy Franklin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.11
David Coman
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
3.08
Ronald Elliott
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
2.94
Bruce Elder
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.91
Stephen Arick
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.85
Jordan Whichard
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published
2.83
Cam Barker
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.53
Brad Manning
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
Shannon Lasater
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ronald Elliott + Bruce Elder123 matchesnot enough data
Timothy Franklin + Jordan Whichard213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Timothy Franklin
23W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.21
3
David Coman
87W–47L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.11
Ronald Elliott
20W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Bruce Elder
20W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
Stephen Arick
10W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
2.91
Jordan Whichard
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
2.85
3
Cam Barker
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
3
Brad Manning
0W–3L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
Shannon Lasater
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.