Teams

FK - Walsh

2022 Marion Adult 55 & Over · 8.0 Adult Women 55 & Over

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-26vs FK - HatfieldSplit 11
L#1 DoublesValerie Elvin / Lori Croy vs Pamela Plumlee / Nancy Little3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJan Cole / Barbara Slatton vs Kathy Hatfield / Kirstin Burri7-6, 6-3
2022-03-05vs Villages - EngSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMarianne Marcoux / Barbara Slatton vs Debbie Reyna / Judy Hoops3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDiane Stablein / Valerie Elvin vs Shelley Watters / Beverly Gates6-3, 6-2
2022-02-26vs SKY - PayneWon 10
W#3 DoublesJan Cole / Valerie Elvin vs Nancy Fetzer / Laura Flanagan7-5, 5-7, 1-0
2022-02-19vs Marion - FK/CentonzeLost 01
L#1 DoublesValerie Elvin / Diane Stablein vs Elaine Parker / Eileen Lombardo3-6, 5-7
2022-01-22vs SKY - PayneSplit 11
W#1 DoublesValerie Elvin / Lori Croy vs Pamelia Payne / Nancy Fetzer6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Jeanne Walsh / Barbara Slatton vs Linda Lademann / Susan Garrick2-6, 3-6
2022-01-15vs Marion - FK/CentonzeLost 01
L#2 DoublesValerie Elvin / Tina Shuman vs Eileen Lombardo / Dina Sapienza6-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Adult Women 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Diane Stablein
published 4
3.54
Lori Croy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
Valerie Elvin
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.37
Marianne Marcoux
published
3.35
Mary Jeanne Walsh
published
3.13
Barbara Slatton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Jan Cole
published 3.5
Linda Brown
published
Lisa Degirolami
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valerie Elvin + Lori Croy5252% gamesnot enough data
Valerie Elvin + Diane Stablein4163% gamesnot enough data
Barbara Slatton + Marianne Marcoux134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diane Stablein
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
Lori Croy
75W–42L career · 2 lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
3.54
Valerie Elvin
125W–108L career · 6 lines in 2022
40%60%<1%
3.53
Marianne Marcoux
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%15%
3.37
Mary Jeanne Walsh
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Barbara Slatton
33W–113L career · 3 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Jan Cole
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
Linda Brown
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Degirolami
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.