Teams

LTUtz/River Run

2022 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Women 7.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-03vs LMKPortaro-McRorie/JettonWon 10
W#2 DoublesJanet Szilagyi / Terri Utz vs Megan Brown / Kelly Stamey2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2022-09-28vs LCBogojevich/CSDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAna Endsjo / Michelle Bowe vs Barbara King / Paige Mcguirk6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLauren Wilson / Terri Utz vs Jennie Carruth / Teresa Pal1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-09-26vs SClancy/EdgemoorSplit 11
L#2 DoublesAna Endsjo / Michelle Bowe vs Diane Pfeil / Jessica Benningfield3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMary Kennedy / Terri Utz vs Bibi Muraira / Karen Allison6-1, 6-4
2022-09-13vs LSDavis/JettonLost 02
L#1 DoublesNina Tracy / Ana Endsjo vs Susan Davis / Traci Dudan3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesMary Kennedy / Terri Utz vs Yin Chee Chin / Cynthia Delay3-6, 4-6
2022-09-12vs LDScripter/EdgemoorLost 01
L#2 DoublesTerri Utz / Ana Endsjo vs Stephanie Schaeper / Melissa Smith3-6, 4-6
2022-08-31vs LAHaigney-JettonLost 01
L#3 DoublesKaren Edge / Ana Endsjo vs Dina White / Kristine Bienstock6-7, 3-6
2022-08-22vs LAHaigney-JettonWon 10
W#2 DoublesTerri Utz / Ana Endsjo vs Jodith Davis / Sheryl Chapman6-1, 6-4
2022-08-15vs LMKPortaro-McRorie/JettonLost 01
L#1 DoublesJanet Szilagyi / Karen Edge vs Liz Miller / Lisa Moyer0-6, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Janet Szilagyi
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Ana Endsjo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 4
3.50
Stephanie Nixdorf
published
3.41
Jann Debord
published
3.41
Nina Tracy
published
3.39
Patricia Sharawy
published
3.37
Michelle Bowe
published
3.34
Lori Moon
published
3.34
Dawn Bush
published 3.5
3.33
Jennife Roberts
published
3.23
Karen Edge
published
3.09
Terri Utz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Endsjo + Terri Utz123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Janet Szilagyi
196W–83L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Ana Endsjo
112W–98L career · 10 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
Stephanie Nixdorf
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.50
Jann Debord
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
Nina Tracy
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%24%
3.41
Patricia Sharawy
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
3.39
Michelle Bowe
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Lori Moon
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Dawn Bush
50W–40L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
Jennife Roberts
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
3.33
Karen Edge
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Terri Utz
105W–92L career · 10 lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
3.09

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.