Teams

FYC - Ferguson

2025 Duval Adult 40 & Over - Women · 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women

15 players · average NTRP 4.30 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-03vs Marsh Landing - CieslaLost 01
L#2 DoublesMEGAN MOLYNEUX / Kelly Banes vs Mary Bush / Gillian Cox7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-03-16vs Duval/Kochis/40&Over4.5WLost 01
L#1 DoublesClaudia Eikner / Kelly Banes vs Andrea Griswell - (DQ) / Krista Brown2-6, 4-6
2025-03-02vs Marsh Landing - CieslaSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMEGAN MOLYNEUX / Kelly Banes vs Mary Bush / Jennifer Katsolis6-4, 6-4
L#4 DoublesTeresa Linck / Ellen Dyal vs Elena Sise / Aimee Powell1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-02-23vs Duval/Kochis/40&Over4.5WLost 01
L#3 DoublesEllen Dyal / Kelly Banes vs Jill Saig / Meredith Frisch4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-02-09vs Marsh Landing - CieslaLost 01
L#3 DoublesEllen Dyal / Teresa Linck vs Fran Rollins / Elena Sise2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.06 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Kelly Banes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.32
Nancy Powell
published
4.24
Mina Saad
published
4.16
Kirstin Luffler
published
4.14
Sue Levin
published
4.08
Stephanie Vihlen
published
4.08
Claudia Eikner
published 4.5
4.03
Jessica Nixon
published
3.94
Julie Ferguson
published
3.93
Michiele Sherman
published
3.84
3.83
Elaine Ward
published 4
3.80
Ellen Dyal
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Jennifer Munson
published
Teresa Linck
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teresa Linck + Ellen Dyal8264% gamesnot enough data
Kirstin Luffler + Amanda Swearingen123 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Vihlen + Julie Ferguson033 matchesnot enough data
Mina Saad + Julie Ferguson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Kelly Banes
136W–60L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
4.37
Nancy Powell
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
4.32
Mina Saad
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
Kirstin Luffler
6W–18L career · no lines in 2025
11%89%<1%
4.16
Sue Levin
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
4.14
Stephanie Vihlen
4W–11L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
4.08
4.5
Claudia Eikner
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
4.08
Jessica Nixon
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
4.03
Julie Ferguson
1W–13L career · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
3.94
Michiele Sherman
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.93
4
Amanda Swearingen
103W–71L career · no lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Elaine Ward
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.83
4.5
Ellen Dyal
69W–58L career · 3 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
3.80
Jennifer Munson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Teresa Linck
20W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.