Teams

Raintree Foster

2023 Richmond Flexible Format Women · Richmond Flexible Format Women 6.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-22vs Magnolia Green WintersWon 10
W#3 Female DoublesElizabeth Pully / Erin Lyons vs Keri Biggins / Katherine Jimenez6-0, 6-0
2023-05-08vs HCC Lines 6.0Won 10
W#3 Female DoublesMarcia Finsterwald / Erin Lyons vs Jennifer Leon / Vanessa Dambrosia6-4, 6-2
2023-05-01vs Westwood FittsWon 10
W#3 Female DoublesErin Lyons / Frances Johnson vs Kristin Zach / Frances Wilkinson6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2023-04-17Won 10
W#2 Female DoublesErin Lyons / Marina Plaksina-Vaniakin vs Melanie Conrad / Katie Gallagher6-2, 6-1
2023-04-10vs MAC StatonWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesCam Nguyen / Erin Lyons vs Ruth Bates / Anne Wolff6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Flexible Format Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Cam Nguyen
published 3.5
3.25
Shannon Foster
published
3.21
3.11
2.88
Erin Lyons
usually #3 Female Doubles 60%, also #2 Female Doubles 40% · published
2.87
Eliza Causey
published
Elizabeth Pully
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cam Nguyen
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
Shannon Foster
15W–11L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
Mary-Margaret Whitten
27W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%6%94%
3.21
Marina Plaksina-Vaniakin
21W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%22%78%
3.11
Erin Lyons
87W–114L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
2.88
Eliza Causey
21W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
2.87
Elizabeth Pully
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.