Teams

WI Mixed 40&Over 7.0 MALT Mavlyutov

2026 WI Mixed 40 & Over · WI Mixed 40 & Over 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-04-26vs WI Mixed 40&Over 7.0 MALT AtwoodLost 03
L#1 DoublesYana Mavlyutov / Timur Mavlyutov vs Lauren Balistreri / Adam Wise2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLindy Stoll / Ben Stoll vs Rebecca Gerothanas / Marc Gerothanas2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesHaiyan Zhou / Chase Peck vs Aneta Kosturova / Craig Atwood5-7, 3-6
2026-04-25vs WI Mixed 40&Over 7.0 MALT AtwoodLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah DeKraay / Edward Halsted vs Aneta Kosturova / Craig Atwood6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesYana Mavlyutov / Timur Mavlyutov vs Jiwon Paik / Adam Wise2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesHaiyan Zhou / Ken Yan vs Lauren Lindley / Joe Leung4-6, 1-6
2026-04-19vs WI Mixed 40&Over 7.0 MALT NeukirchLost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah DeKraay / Edward Halsted vs Iris Kurman / Edd Hellmer6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesYana Mavlyutov / Ken Yan vs Grace Wenham / Sameer Mathur7-6, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHaiyan Zhou / Timur Mavlyutov vs Susan Yackee / Seth Dailey2-6, 1-6
2026-04-10vs WI Mixed 40&Over 7.0 MALT NeukirchLost 12
W#1 DoublesSarah DeKraay / Chase Peck vs Iris Kurman / Jeremy Parrish6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLindy Stoll / Ben Stoll vs Candice DeJarlais / Nithin Sathyamoorthy2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesHaiyan Zhou / Ken Yan vs Abbey Fuszard / Seth Dailey5-7, 2-6
2026-03-18vs WI Mixed 40&Over 7.0 MALT AtwoodLost 03
L#1 DoublesLindy Stoll / Ben Stoll vs Aneta Kosturova / John Montognese-Bergamini0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesYana Mavlyutov / Timur Mavlyutov vs Jun Lee / Kevin McAllister1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesChase Peck / Haiyan Zhou vs Jiwon Paik / R Rama Chandran3-6, 2-6
2026-03-08vs WI Mixed 40&Over 7.0 MALT NeukirchLost 12
L#1 DoublesLindy Stoll / Edward Halsted vs Abbey Fuszard / Nithin Sathyamoorthy3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSarah DeKraay / Timur Mavlyutov vs Grace Wenham / Edd Hellmer7-6, 0-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesYana Mavlyutov / Chase Peck vs Rachel Warrick / Jay Warrick3-6, 0-6
2026-02-22vs WI Mixed 40&Over 7.0 MALT AtwoodLost 03
L#1 DoublesLindy Stoll / Ben Stoll vs Lauren Lindley / John Montognese-Bergamini7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesYana Mavlyutov / Chase Peck vs Danielle Kamps / Joe Leung7-6, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHaiyan Zhou / Ken Yan vs Rebecca Gerothanas / Marc Gerothanas2-6, 1-6
2026-02-15vs WI Mixed 40&Over 7.0 MALT NeukirchLost 12
L#1 DoublesYana Mavlyutov / Timur Mavlyutov vs Grace Wenham / Edd Hellmer4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSarah DeKraay / Edward Halsted vs Candice DeJarlais / Sameer Mathur6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLindy Stoll / Ben Stoll vs Rachel Warrick / Jay Warrick3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · WI Mixed 40 & Over 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI Mixed 40&Over 7.0 MALT Atwood7120411168
2WI Mixed 40&Over 7.0 MALT Neukirch53121226216
3WI Mixed 40&Over 7.0 MALT Mavlyutov0842043282

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Sarah DeKraay
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.27
Yana Mavlyutov
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.26
Edward Halsted
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.25
Lindy Stoll
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Ben Stoll
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.21
Chase Peck
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.15
Timur Mavlyutov
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Haiyan Zhou
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ken Yan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Timur Mavlyutov + Yana Mavlyutov102838% games−5.9% vs expected
Lindy Stoll + Ben Stoll3641% gamesnot enough data
Edward Halsted + Sarah DeKraay134 matchesnot enough data
Haiyan Zhou + Ken Yan033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sarah DeKraay
20W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
3.34
Yana Mavlyutov
126W–152L career · 7 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Edward Halsted
24W–37L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
Lindy Stoll
12W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Ben Stoll
3W–11L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Chase Peck
257W–173L career · 5 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.21
Timur Mavlyutov
111W–140L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.15
3
Haiyan Zhou
37W–39L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%45%55%
3.02
Ken Yan
2W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.