Teams

MC RED

2024 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-21vs MVCC GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesRom van der Zee / Matthew Williams vs John Truchel / Brett Vladika7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2024-08-14vs MC ORANGEWon 10
W#2 DoublesRom van der Zee / Sean Cochran vs Jules Perryman / Frank LaForge6-3, 6-4
2024-08-07vs NJ REDSplit 11
L#1 SinglesBryan Racz vs Rafael Rosario3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRom van der Zee / Ikiru Tochizawa vs Brad Nash / Dave Kranzler6-1, 6-4
2024-07-31vs KC-CC ORANGEWon 10
W#1 SinglesBryan Racz vs Vernon Kercher6-1, 6-1
2024-07-24vs LTC-M PURPLESplit 11
L#1 DoublesRom van der Zee / Eamon Troy vs John Crook / John Guillod2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesBryan Racz vs Shawn Blazer6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Bryan Racz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.74
Matthew Williams
published
3.73
Rom van der Zee
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.45
Andrew Adams
published 4
3.42
Eamon Troy
published
3.03
Stuart Adams
published
Ikiru Tochizawa
published
Kishore Kulkarni
published
Sean Cochran
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Williams + Rom van der Zee4353% games+2.1% vs expected
Kishore Kulkarni + Rom van der Zee3249% gamesnot enough data
Stuart Adams + Andrew Adams033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bryan Racz
33W–22L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.84
Matthew Williams
19W–14L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.74
4
Rom van der Zee
63W–52L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
Andrew Adams
1W–11L career · no lines in 2024
64%36%<1%
3.45
Eamon Troy
0W–7L career · no lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
3.42
Stuart Adams
12W–45L career · no lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
3.03
Ikiru Tochizawa
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Kishore Kulkarni
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sean Cochran
1W–8L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.