Teams

BTA-Trolls-Pham

2026 Coed 18-39 · 3.5 Coed

12 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-03-01vs TCSP-Aperol Fritz-BaclaganLost 01
L#1 Female DoublesSaung Mundt / Jeng Tcheung vs Neesha Pinnaduwage / Jimena Diaz5-6
L#1 Female DoublesSaung Mundt / Katherine Matias vs Kathleen Berkeley / Rebecca Garibay4-6
2026-02-07vs RTC-Ball Busters-SadangLost 01
L#1 Female SinglesNataly Reyes vs Tammy Hu2-6
2026-01-24vs WSC-Hotpot-Coed-FengWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesSaung Mundt / Alyssa Miller vs Tracy Chen / Alexis Chen6-1
2026-01-18vs ETC-etras 3.5-LiangLost 04
L#1 Female DoublesSaung Mundt / Nataly Reyes vs Stephanie Kung / Jessmin Lau1-6
L#1 Female SinglesSaung Mundt vs Dina Kosiakova1-6
L#1 Male DoublesMichael Ho / Phillip Pham vs Stephen Liang / Wei Luk3-6
L#1 Male SinglesMichael Ho vs Stephen Liang0-6
2026-01-10vs AYTC-Level Up-TongLost 12
L#1 Female SinglesNataly Reyes vs Xiayi Li2-6
L#1 Male DoublesPhillip Pham / Michael Ho vs Alexis Garcia / Jiaxing Zheng5-6
W#1 Male SinglesPhillip Pham vs Alexis Garcia6-1
2026-01-04vs AYTC-Serve & Acquisition-Wu/PanSplit 11
L#1 Female DoublesNataly Reyes / Jeng Tcheung vs Erica Jordan / Karen Pan3-6
W#1 Male SinglesPhillip Pham vs Minh Chau6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Coed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Phillip Pham
usually #1 Male Singles 63%, also #1 Male Doubles 38% · published 3
3.20
Jeng Tcheung
published
3.16
Hsia-Ming Hsu
published 3.5
3.15
Kenneth Yontwises
published
3.00
Michael Ho
usually #1 Male Doubles 50%, also #1 Male Singles 50% · published 3.5
2.99
Annie Chen
published 3.5
2.85
Alyssa Miller
published 3.5
2.84
Saung Mundt
usually #1 Female Doubles 56%, also #1 Female Singles 44% · published 3
2.76
Katherine Matias
published
2.54
Georgy Gorelko
published 3
2.53
Nataly Reyes
usually #1 Female Doubles 50%, also #1 Female Singles 50% · published 3
Sathish Sekar
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Phillip Pham
54W–15L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.21
Jeng Tcheung
4W–9L career · no lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Hsia-Ming Hsu
0W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
3.16
Kenneth Yontwises
1W–6L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Michael Ho
0W–9L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.00
3.5
Annie Chen
2W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.99
3.5
Alyssa Miller
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
87%13%<1%
2.85
3
Saung Mundt
51W–38L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.84
Katherine Matias
12W–16L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Georgy Gorelko
3W–17L career · type S · no lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
2.54
3
Nataly Reyes
0W–8L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
40%60%<1%
2.53
Sathish Sekar
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.