Teams

Thompson-WatsonCCL40

2024 SOUTH EAST TENNIS ADULT 40 & OVER · WOMEN 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-06-03vs WILSON 4.0 (40)Won 10
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Palmer / Kathleen Timberlake vs Debra Jones / Jeanne Gillen4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-05-16vs Atterbury 40sWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Palmer / Kathleen Timberlake vs Anne Egger / Carolyn Noto6-3, 6-2
2024-04-21vs Tatum/SenterWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Palmer / Kathleen Timberlake vs Jackie Cruse / Heather Senter6-2, 6-4
2024-04-18vs WILSON 4.0 (40)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Elsberry / Kathleen Timberlake vs Debra Jones / Jeanne Gillen3-6, 4-6
2024-04-14vs Glancy 40 Spring '24Won 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Elizabeth Palmer vs Ashlee Ramsey / Audrey Robbins6-2, 6-2
2024-04-08vs Atterbury 40sWon 10
W#1 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Elizabeth Palmer vs Anne Egger / Angie Coats6-2, 6-3
2024-03-24vs Adams PVWon 10
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Palmer / Kathleen Timberlake vs Rebecca Durham / Candy Garrett6-3, 6-3
2024-03-19vs Felton/FeilerLost 01
L#2 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Elizabeth Palmer vs Lisa Gilbert / Melissa Rahe5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2024-03-12vs Rabon/KelleyLost 01
L#3 DoublesKathleen Timberlake / Kelly Bradshaw vs Martha Broadbent / Karyn Shane4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.12
Lisa Elsberry
published
4.11
Katie Swain
published
3.95
Lee Ann Zierenberg
published
3.91
Kathleen Timberlake
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.84
Anne Broderick
published 4
3.72
Desiree Morgan
published 4
3.70
Jill Scerri
published
3.63
Lisa Sottung
published
3.55
Terri Meier
published
3.43
Kelly Bradshaw
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Broderick + Desiree Morgan0547% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Elsberry
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%18%82%
4.12
Katie Swain
33W–8L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
4.11
Lee Ann Zierenberg
36W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
3.95
4
Kathleen Timberlake
158W–61L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.91
4
Anne Broderick
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%11%
3.84
4
Desiree Morgan
7W–15L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.72
Jill Scerri
12W–11L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
Lisa Sottung
49W–41L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.63
Terri Meier
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
35%65%<1%
3.55
Kelly Bradshaw
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.43

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.