Teams

CEdwards

2022 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 9.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-10-04vs ABadulisLost 01
L#1 DoublesJustin Roberson / Richard McClenny vs Joshua Franceschina / Allan Badulis2-6, 4-6
2022-09-20vs JLivesayWon 10
W#3 DoublesJohn Preiss / Richard McClenny vs John Livesay / Joe Caprio7-5, 6-3
2022-09-13Won 10
W#2 DoublesAndrew Moretz / Richard McClenny vs Zachary Nelson / Anthony Davis6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-08-23vs ABadulisWon 10
W#1 DoublesJustin Roberson / Richard McClenny vs Peter Vangraafeiland / Leslie Boney6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
Dan Parham
published 5
4.40
Jonathan Hodges
published
4.31
Christopher Edwards
published 4.5
4.25
Richard McClenny
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.24
Andrew Moretz
published 4.5
4.20
Martin Green
published
4.13
John Preiss
published
3.92
Benjamin Koren
published 4
Joe Ruggieri
published
Victor Meir
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Dan Parham
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
4.54
Jonathan Hodges
15W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
4.40
4.5
Christopher Edwards
4W–1L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Richard McClenny
432W–130L career · 7 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Andrew Moretz
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
3%94%2%
4.24
Martin Green
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.20
John Preiss
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
4.13
4
Benjamin Koren
9W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.92
Joe Ruggieri
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Victor Meir
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.