Teams

MONTE VISTA HS 40AW3.0B

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.35
Christine Brashear
published 3.5
3.13
Rebecca Bergman
published
2.83
Lesley Wolff
published
2.82
Carrie Iturreria
published 3
2.82
Sarah Euglow
published
2.77
Kathleen Dunlap
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.77
Lindsey Splendorio
published
2.75
Tracy Garza
published
2.73
Jennifer Stein
published
2.70
Mayura Hooper
published
2.69
Wendy Haworth
published
2.67
Rachel Miegel
published
2.59
Maria Angel-Ordonez
published
2.52
Kuldip Chohan
published
2.50
Sally Malek
published
2.39
Deborah Hamilton
published 3
2.19
Gina Zahedi
published
Robin Azevedo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Angel-Ordonez + Gina Zahedi5844% games+4.6% vs expected
Rebecca Bergman + Mayura Hooper224 matchesnot enough data
Lesley Wolff + Tracy Garza213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christine Brashear
22W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.35
Rebecca Bergman
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
Lesley Wolff
4W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Carrie Iturreria
7W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Sarah Euglow
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Kathleen Dunlap
8W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Lindsey Splendorio
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
Tracy Garza
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Jennifer Stein
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%5%95%
2.73
Mayura Hooper
5W–8L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Wendy Haworth
10W–14L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Rachel Miegel
2W–13L career · no lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
Simone van der Waart van Gulik
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Maria Angel-Ordonez
13W–22L career · no lines in 2025
0%26%74%
2.59
Kuldip Chohan
0W–4L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Sally Malek
4W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%49%51%
2.50
3
Deborah Hamilton
2W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.39
Gina Zahedi
8W–17L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
Robin Azevedo
7W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.