Teams

KSwain (Park Road)

2025 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Mixed 3.5 - Mon PM

10 players · average NTRP 3.60 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-29vs KGissy/BDavis (Queens)Won 20
W#2 DoublesVolodymyr Stakh / Stephanie Stanton vs Qianyi Zhao / Yuefeng Han6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKrishna Swain / Carol Davis vs Yuan Zhao / Barbara Davis6-2, 6-0
2025-07-16vs CKing/SMcDonald (Life Time)Split 11
L#1 DoublesKrishna Swain / Franchone Bey vs Rajesh Pokala / Susan McDonald4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesVolodymyr Stakh / Teneika Funderburk vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-07vs HFranc (Piper Glen)Won 10
W#1 DoublesTeneika Funderburk / Volodymyr Stakh vs Stephanie Rock / Singh B Dhillon6-4, 6-4
2025-06-30vs CLin (WSRC)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesSatya Manikonda / Teneika Funderburk vs Dhruv Bhatt / Wendy Ranadive6-7, 0-6
2025-06-23vs KGissy/BDavis (Queens)Won 20
W#2 DoublesKrishna Swain / Iris Hubbard vs Harold Rosbottom / Qianyi Zhao7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesVolodymyr Stakh / Lakesha Johnson vs Kim Gissy / Enes Maxhuni6-1, 6-4
2025-06-06vs CKing/SMcDonald (Life Time)Won 21
L#1 DoublesFranchone Bey / Saurabh Tyagi vs Melanie Rebosa / Rajesh Pokala5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesVolodymyr Stakh / Iris Hubbard vs Silvia Engel / Kiran Challamarad6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKrishna Swain / Stephanie Stanton vs Sumit Chopra / Christine King6-1, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Mixed 3.5 - Mon PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Volodymyr Stakh
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.49
Saurabh Tyagi
published
3.44
Franchone Bey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Irmeya Ouedraogo
published
3.34
Krishna Swain
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.33
Carol Davis
published 3.5
3.16
Stephanie Stanton
published
3.08
Teneika Funderburk
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Lakesha Johnson
published
2.98
Iris Hubbard
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Volodymyr Stakh
47W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Saurabh Tyagi
14W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Franchone Bey
65W–54L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%65%34%
3.44
Irmeya Ouedraogo
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
80%20%<1%
3.38
3.5
Krishna Swain
74W–93L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%86%13%
3.34
3.5
Carol Davis
2W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Stephanie Stanton
54W–60L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Teneika Funderburk
90W–110L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.08
Lakesha Johnson
1W–6L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Iris Hubbard
23W–49L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.